Who is responsible for the articles?
MF Analyser Editorial is the publication's organisational byline. It identifies MF Analyser as responsible for the explanation; it does not imply that a named financial professional or an independent expert reviewed it. Individual names, credentials and specialist review are credited only when they are supplied and that work has actually taken place.
The website's ownership, business and support details are available on About MF Analyser and the contact page. A generic editorial byline should not be interpreted as a professional qualification.
What counts as evidence?
Official regulatory notices, exchange circulars, scheme documents, company filings and statistical releases take priority for the facts they directly establish. News reports are identified as reports when they provide additional context or when a primary document cannot be accessed. Research prompts and AI-generated briefs are discovery aids, not independent evidence.
Article source lists link to the underlying documents and reporting. A consultation is described as a proposal, an approval as an approval, and a forecast as a forecast. An event date, an effective date and the date this article was published may be different; each belongs to its own statement.
How are calculations and charts handled?
Reported data should state its source, period and units. Worked examples should expose the inputs and arithmetic so that readers can reproduce them. Hypothetical prices, margins, investment returns and scenarios are labelled as illustrative; they are not company guidance or a prediction.
Portfolio disclosures are dated snapshots. A comparison must disclose its relevant window, plan, benchmark and coverage. The separate data and calculation methodology explains the research platform's data; an editorial scenario must not be presented as a live platform measurement.
How is AI assistance disclosed?
AI can assist with drafting, structure, calculations and editorial cover images. Articles that use AI assistance carry a visible disclosure. Generated covers are editorial illustrations, not documentary photographs of the event. AI output is not itself a source, and the disclosure does not establish accuracy or expert review.
How do dates and corrections work?
The original publication time is retained. Publication and update dates are displayed in Indian Standard Time; the database stores UTC. The update date changes when article content or metadata is saved, rather than being automatically refreshed each day.
The editor provides a public update-note field. A material correction should explain what changed and why; submitted notes are retained in the article's visible update history. Routine wording and linking edits may show an update date without a material factual correction. This policy does not claim that every historical article has undergone a specialist review.
How can a reader report an error?
Use MF Analyser support or email support@investverdict.com. Include the article URL, the disputed statement, a supporting source and the suggested correction. Avoid sending personal account or financial details.
What can these articles help you do?
They explain investment concepts, public developments and transparent examples. They do not give personalised investment advice, endorse an NFO because it is new, or promise future returns. Check current scheme documents and the data date on any linked tool before relying on a figure.
MF Analyser states that it is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance does not indicate future returns.