PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund
Direct–Growth is the plan and option we treat as this fund's main page, so search engines are pointed there. Everything below is this filing's own data.
Fund basics
Everything the NAV says
Computed from 636 published NAVs between 16 Feb 2024 and 16 Sep 2026 — 2.6 years of history. Nothing here is an estimate; it is arithmetic on what the fund actually printed.
How it has moved
Return over time (%)
| Fund name | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 7Y | 10Y | Since launch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund Regular | -4.59 | 0.53 | 0.62 | -7.97 | — | — | — | — | 4.75 |
| Nifty LargeMidcap 250 benchmark | -4.60 | -7.94 | -2.03 | -7.04 | 8.54 | — | — | — | 10.32 |
| Large & Mid Cap category median · 32 funds | — | — | — | 2.36 | 11.90 | 10.58 | — | 13.36 | — |
Anything over a year is annualised (CAGR); shorter windows are absolute. The benchmark row is the index fund named below, priced daily by AMFI like every other scheme here. The category row is the median Regular plan in Large & Mid Cap — the middle fund, not a ranking, and a median rather than an average so that one mis-stated scheme cannot move it. As on 24 Sep 2026.
Risk measures
| Fund name | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Beta | Alpha | Max fall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund Regular | 14.62 | -0.12 | -0.16 | 0.92 | 0.09 | -20.28 |
| Nifty LargeMidcap 250 benchmark | 14.85 | 0.14 | 0.19 | — | — | -18.87 |
Risk-free rate 6.5%. Beta and alpha need an index, so the benchmark's own row leaves them blank.
Risk
| Volatility | Downside volatility | Sharpe | Sortino |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.6% | 11.0% | -0.12 | -0.16 |
Risk-free rate 6.5%, roughly the 10-year government bond.
The worst it has been
| Deepest fall | Time to recover | Today, from its peak |
|---|---|---|
| -20.3% | — | -9.8% |
A drawdown is the fall from a previous high to the low that followed it. It is the number that decides whether somebody stays invested — a fund can have an excellent ten-year return and still have been unbearable to hold in year four.
Every one-year period it has lived through
| Best year | Median year | Worst year | Losing years |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.4% | 2.9% | -10.6% | 37% |
Rolling returns ask a fairer question than a single five-year figure: not "what did it do from this one start date", but "what happened across every start date". A fund whose worst year is −45% is a different proposition from one whose worst is −8%, even if the averages match.
Calendar years
What it actually holds
The real portfolio the AMC filed with AMFI. Nothing here is estimated — when a fund has no filing in our store the section simply does not appear. A fund is its holdings; the returns above are only what those holdings did.
Asset allocation
A fund's risk starts here — how much of it is even in the market — before any question of which stocks or which sectors. Cash is not idleness; it is the manager's choice not to be invested, and it shows up as a drag in a rising market and a cushion in a falling one.
Portfolio aggregates
AMFI has not classified this scheme's holdings into large, mid and small cap in the filing we hold, so there is no split to show. The section is left here rather than hidden so it is clear the data is missing, not that the fund holds nothing.
Concentration
| Number of stocks | 79 |
|---|---|
| Top 5 stocks | 18.26% |
| Top 10 stocks | 29.21% |
| Top 20 stocks | 44.72% |
| Largest single holding | 5.18% |
| Largest sector | Banks · 14.24% |
| Number of sectors | 31 |
| Effective stocks | 58.1 |
| Cash & equivalents | 2.08% |
Counting positions overstates diversification. The effective-stocks figure is the honest count: a portfolio can hold seventy names and still have most of its money in twenty.
Sector allocation
Largest holdings
Top 10 are 29.5% of the fund. A high number means a concentrated portfolio — fewer names doing more of the work, for better and for worse.
Disclosed holdings from the AMC's AMFI filing, largest first. A portfolio is filed monthly and shifts between filings — this is the most recent one loaded, not a live book.
How it compares in its category
Against the Large & Mid Cap Regular schemes with the highest three-year return. Same category, same plan — the only comparison that means anything. The list re-sorts itself as returns move; it is an ordering by one number, not a view on which fund anyone should hold.
| Scheme | Return | Alpha | Beta | Volatility | Sharpe | Max fall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund PGIM India Mutual Fund · this scheme | — | 0.1% | 0.92 | 14.6% | -0.12 | -20.3% |
| Invesco India Large & Mid Cap Fund Invesco Mutual Fund | 20.1% | 5.6% | 1.01 | 17.5% | 0.78 | -58.9% |
| Motilal Oswal Large and Midcap Fund Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund | 19.7% | 7.0% | 1.09 | 19.2% | 0.69 | -37.5% |
| Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund Bandhan Mutual Fund | 15.4% | 5.6% | 0.94 | 17.6% | 0.51 | -45.7% |
| HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund HSBC Mutual Fund | 15.6% | 3.0% | 0.99 | 18.2% | 0.50 | -36.2% |
| ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap Fund ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund | 12.9% | 4.9% | 0.82 | 19.1% | 0.33 | -55.7% |
| Axis Large & Mid Cap Fund Axis Mutual Fund | 13.1% | 0.5% | 0.90 | 14.5% | 0.46 | -32.0% |
| UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund UTI Mutual Fund | 12.6% | 3.8% | 0.91 | 21.6% | 0.28 | -70.1% |
| Nippon India Vision Large & Mid Cap Fund Nippon India Mutual Fund | 12.7% | 2.7% | 0.92 | 19.9% | 0.31 | -60.8% |
Alpha and beta are against Nifty LargeMidcap 250. Max fall is the deepest peak-to-trough drop in each fund's own history, so a longer-running fund has had more chances to record a bad one. Click a column to sort. This is a sort, not a ranking, and nothing here is a recommendation.
What a Large & Mid Cap scheme is
At least 35% in large caps and 35% in mid caps.
A fixed blend of stability and growth, written into the rules. It sits between a large-cap and a mid-cap fund without the manager being able to drift to whichever is winning.
Who it suits. Somebody who finds pure mid cap too sharp and pure large cap too slow.
How long money should stay. 7 years or more.
Questions people ask
What is the NAV of PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund — Regular Plan — Regular IDCW?
₹11.5100 as on 24 Sep 2026, from AMFI's daily NAV file. NAV is declared once each business day after markets close, so the figure here is the most recent one published.
What is the difference between the Direct and Regular plan of PGIM India Large and Midcap Fund?
They hold the identical portfolio, run by the same manager. A Regular plan pays a distributor commission out of the fund, inside its expense ratio — commonly 0.5% to 1.2% a year more than Direct. That difference is charged on the whole balance, every year, so it compounds: on ₹1,00,000 held ten years a gap of 1.5 percentage points is roughly ₹1.4 lakh of ending value. Direct is the same fund without the commission.
What does the Regular IDCW option mean?
An IDCW option pays part of the fund's gains out to you, and the NAV falls by exactly what it pays. It is not extra return — it is your own money returned, taxed at your slab rate. That also means a return computed from NAV alone understates an IDCW scheme, which is why no CAGR is shown here for it.
What kind of scheme is this?
At least 35% in large caps and 35% in mid caps. A fixed blend of stability and growth, written into the rules. It sits between a large-cap and a mid-cap fund without the manager being able to drift to whichever is winning.
How long should money stay in it?
Typically 7 years or more. Somebody who finds pure mid cap too sharp and pure large cap too slow.