MF Analyser

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi Asset Fund vs PGIM India Multi Asset Allocation Fund

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi Asset Fund and PGIM India Multi Asset Allocation Fund are both Multi Asset Allocation funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +14.96% vs —, 5-year CAGR — vs —, volatility 11.71% vs —, maximum drawdown −11.95% vs −12.08%.

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi AssetPGIM India Multi Asset Allocation
Fund houseBaroda BNP Paribas Mutual FundPGIM India Mutual Fund
Compared asMulti Asset AllocationMulti Asset Allocation
NAV₹17.0554₹10.5900
NAV date6 Nov 20266 Nov 2026
Launched (first NAV)26 Dec 20223 Dec 2025
Track record3.9 yrs0.9 yrs
Fund size (AUM)₹1,398 Cr—
Securities held68—
Portfolio as of30 Sep 2026Not disclosed yet
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi AssetPGIM India Multi Asset Allocation
1 month+3.80%+2.42%
3 months−1.45%−1.58%
6 months+0.25%+0.95%
1 year+6.11%—
3 years (CAGR)+14.96%—
5 years (CAGR)——
7 years (CAGR)——
10 years (CAGR)——
Since launch (CAGR)+14.89%—
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ——

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi AssetPGIM India Multi Asset Allocation
2026 (year to date)+2.72%+3.42%
2025+15.03%—
2024+15.91%—
2023+24.70%—

Risk

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi AssetPGIM India Multi Asset Allocation
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ11.71%—
Downside volatility ⓘ7.78%—
Sharpe ratio ⓘ0.72—
Sortino ratio ⓘ1.09—
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−11.95%−12.08%
Recovery from that fall4 months5 months
Current fall from peak−2.44%−3.11%
Rolling 1-year return: worst−1.93%—
Rolling 1-year return: median+13.38%—
Rolling 1-year return: best+38.51%—
Share of 1-year periods with a loss1.13%—

Against each fund's benchmark

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi AssetPGIM India Multi Asset Allocation
Beta ⓘ0.74—
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ+4.78%—
R² ⓘ89.27—
Upside capture87.91%—
Downside capture52.93%—
Tracking error5.39%—
Information ratio0.92—
Treynor ratio9.29—

Portfolio

PGIM India Multi Asset Allocation Fund has no usable portfolio disclosure on file yet, so portfolio comparisons are shown only where available.

Asset mix

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi AssetPGIM India Multi Asset Allocation
Equity70.24%—
Gold15.09%—
Debt10.45%—
Cash & equivalents3.10%—
REITs / InvITs1.12%—

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi AssetPGIM India Multi Asset Allocation
Large Cap47.09%—
Mid Cap16.25%—
Small Cap5.51%—
Unclassified1.39%—

Concentration

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi AssetPGIM India Multi Asset Allocation
Top 10 holdings41.61%—
Effective number of stocks ⓘ36.8—
Securities held68—

Top 10 holdings

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi Asset

  1. Nippon India ETF Gold Bees7.91%
  2. Baroda BNP Paribas Gold ETF-RG7.18%
  3. ICICI Bank Limited4.60%
  4. HDFC Bank Limited4.24%
  5. Hitachi Energy India Limited3.85%
  6. Reliance Industries Limited3.82%
  7. Larsen & Toubro Limited3.51%
  8. Bharti Airtel Limited2.49%
  9. Eternal Limited2.14%
  10. Linde India Limited1.87%

PGIM India Multi Asset Allocation

Not disclosed yet.

Sector exposure

Baroda BNP Paribas Multi AssetPGIM India Multi Asset Allocation
Banks14.68%—
ETFs7.91%—
Other7.18%—
Electrical Equipment5.46%—
IT - Software4.17%—
Petroleum Products3.82%—
Sovereign3.78%—
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology3.72%—
Construction3.51%—
Power3.40%—
Telecom - Services2.49%—
CRISIL AAA2.49%—
Cement & Cement Products2.47%—
Food Products2.19%—

Questions people ask

What is the difference between Baroda BNP Paribas Multi Asset and PGIM India Multi Asset Allocation returns?

As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +6.11% vs —; 3-year CAGR +14.96% vs —; 5-year CAGR — vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do Baroda BNP Paribas Multi Asset and PGIM India Multi Asset Allocation compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 11.71% vs —; Sharpe ratio 0.72 vs —; Sortino ratio 1.09 vs —; maximum drawdown −11.95% vs −12.08%; beta 0.74 vs —.

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Multi Asset Allocation comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.