MF Analyser

ITI Business Cycle Fund vs Tata Business Cycle Fund

ITI Business Cycle Fund and Tata Business Cycle Fund are both Business Cycle Funds. As of 4 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR — vs +10.47%, 5-year CAGR — vs +12.72%, volatility — vs 15.77%, maximum drawdown −12.35% vs −20.01%. Their portfolios overlap by 11.5% (7 stocks held by both).

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

ITI Business CycleTata Business Cycle
Fund houseITI Mutual FundTata Mutual Fund
Compared asBusiness Cycle FundsBusiness Cycle Funds
NAV₹10.3081₹19.5935
NAV date4 Nov 20264 Nov 2026
Launched (first NAV)12 Mar 202611 Aug 2021
Track record0.6 yrs5.2 yrs
Fund size (AUM)₹117 Cr₹2,416 Cr
Securities held7150
Portfolio as of30 Sep 202630 Sep 2026
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

ITI Business CycleTata Business Cycle
1 month−1.46%+1.07%
3 months−2.73%−6.40%
6 months−1.65%−3.71%
1 year—−4.66%
3 years (CAGR)—+10.47%
5 years (CAGR)—+12.72%
7 years (CAGR)——
10 years (CAGR)——
Since launch (CAGR)—+13.75%
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ—+10.15%

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

ITI Business CycleTata Business Cycle
2026 (year to date)—−3.83%
2025—+2.23%
2024—+20.37%
2023—+36.54%
2022—+15.42%

Risk

ITI Business CycleTata Business Cycle
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ—15.77%
Downside volatility ⓘ—11.15%
Sharpe ratio ⓘ—0.25
Sortino ratio ⓘ—0.36
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−12.35%−20.01%
Recovery from that fall——
Current fall from peak−6.93%−10.11%
Rolling 1-year return: worst—−10.31%
Rolling 1-year return: median—+10.57%
Rolling 1-year return: best—+57.65%
Share of 1-year periods with a loss—13.72%

Against each fund's benchmark

ITI Business CycleTata Business Cycle
Beta ⓘ—0.99
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ—−0.89%
R² ⓘ—93.79
Upside capture—98.81%
Downside capture—104.03%
Tracking error—4.01%
Information ratio—-0.27
Treynor ratio—2.64

Portfolio

Asset mix

ITI Business CycleTata Business Cycle
Equity91.32%97.76%
Cash & equivalents8.68%2.24%

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

ITI Business CycleTata Business Cycle
Large Cap30.01%46.06%
Mid Cap23.44%21.29%
Small Cap27.98%29.47%
Unclassified9.89%0.94%

Concentration

ITI Business CycleTata Business Cycle
Top 10 holdings25.37%34.42%
Effective number of stocks ⓘ64.141.9
Securities held7150

Portfolio overlap: 11.5%

7 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 11.5% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a low overlap: the two portfolios are largely different.

Held by bothITI Business CycleTata Business Cycle
HDFC Bank Limited3.83%3.73%
Reliance Industries Limited1.93%4.80%
HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited2.01%1.38%
Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited1.30%1.95%
Dr. Lal Path Labs Limited1.13%1.93%
Marico Limited1.10%2.08%
DCB Bank Limited0.90%1.40%

Top 10 holdings

ITI Business Cycle

  1. ESDS Software Solution Ltd6.03%
  2. HDFC Bank Limited3.83%
  3. ICICI Bank Limited2.37%
  4. Eternal Limited2.19%
  5. Manipal Payment and Identity Solutions Ltd2.02%
  6. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited2.01%
  7. Reliance Industries Limited1.93%
  8. Titan Company Limited1.70%
  9. Bajaj Auto Limited1.70%
  10. Laurus Labs Limited1.59%

Tata Business Cycle

  1. Reliance Industries Limited4.80%
  2. Metropolis Healthcare Limited4.25%
  3. Axis Bank Limited3.95%
  4. Jindal Steel Limited3.92%
  5. HDFC Bank Limited3.73%
  6. L&T Finance Limited2.96%
  7. Larsen & Toubro Limited2.92%
  8. Delhivery Limited2.78%
  9. Cummins India Limited2.58%
  10. Adani Energy Solutions Limited2.53%

Sector exposure

ITI Business CycleTata Business Cycle
Banks14.10%9.08%
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology12.62%3.15%
Finance3.48%8.69%
Healthcare Services4.33%8.13%
Industrial Products4.48%7.00%
Cement & Cement Products1.41%6.72%
IT - Services6.03%0.00%
Ferrous Metals0.92%5.95%
Insurance2.01%5.29%
Petroleum Products1.93%4.80%
Power1.01%4.42%
Chemicals & Petrochemicals4.31%0.00%
Financial Technology (Fintech)2.80%4.08%
Auto Components1.28%3.92%

Questions people ask

What is the difference between ITI Business Cycle and Tata Business Cycle returns?

As of 4 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return — vs −4.66%; 3-year CAGR — vs +10.47%; 5-year CAGR — vs +12.72%; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do ITI Business Cycle and Tata Business Cycle compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) — vs 15.77%; Sharpe ratio — vs 0.25; Sortino ratio — vs 0.36; maximum drawdown −12.35% vs −20.01%; beta — vs 0.99.

How much do ITI Business Cycle and Tata Business Cycle overlap?

By weight, 11.5% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 7 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being HDFC Bank Limited, Reliance Industries Limited, HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.

What is the large, mid and small cap split of ITI Business Cycle and Tata Business Cycle?

ITI Business Cycle: large cap 30.0%, mid cap 23.4%, small cap 28.0%. Tata Business Cycle: large cap 46.1%, mid cap 21.3%, small cap 29.5% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Business Cycle Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 4 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.