LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF vs Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF
LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF and Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF are both Nifty 100 Index Funds & ETFs. As of 5 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +10.72% vs —, 5-year CAGR +8.01% vs —, volatility 14.79% vs 15.12%, maximum drawdown −38.01% vs −17.23%. Their portfolios overlap by 98.7% (100 stocks held by both).
Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.
Key facts
| LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF | Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | LIC Mutual Fund | Zerodha CASE Mutual Fund |
| Compared as | Nifty 100 Index Funds & ETFs | Nifty 100 Index Funds & ETFs |
| NAV | ₹279.7770 | ₹10.7299 |
| NAV date | 5 Nov 2026 | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Launched (first NAV) | 18 Mar 2016 | 18 Jun 2024 |
| Track record | 10.6 yrs | 2.4 yrs |
| Fund size (AUM) | ₹698 Cr | ₹165 Cr |
| Securities held | 100 | 100 |
| Portfolio as of | 30 Sep 2026 | 30 Sep 2026 |
| Fund page | Full record → | Full record → |
Returns
| LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF | Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +6.77% | +6.79% |
| 3 months | −0.96% | −0.88% |
| 6 months | +1.39% | +1.52% |
| 1 year | −2.28% | −2.02% |
| 3 years (CAGR) | +10.72% | — |
| 5 years (CAGR) | +8.01% | — |
| 7 years (CAGR) | +12.16% | — |
| 10 years (CAGR) | +12.35% | — |
| Since launch (CAGR) | +12.95% | +2.43% |
| SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ | +7.99% | — |
Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.
Calendar-year returns
| LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF | Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (year to date) | −3.77% | −3.55% |
| 2025 | +9.95% | +10.15% |
| 2024 | +12.58% | — |
| 2023 | +20.76% | — |
| 2022 | +4.76% | — |
| 2021 | +25.98% | — |
Risk
| LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF | Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (annualised) ⓘ | 14.79% | 15.12% |
| Downside volatility ⓘ | 10.57% | 11.76% |
| Sharpe ratio ⓘ | 0.29 | -0.27 |
| Sortino ratio ⓘ | 0.40 | -0.35 |
| Maximum drawdown ⓘ | −38.01% | −17.23% |
| Recovery from that fall | 8 months | — |
| Current fall from peak | −4.82% | −4.40% |
| Rolling 1-year return: worst | −32.95% | −10.47% |
| Rolling 1-year return: median | +10.85% | +1.22% |
| Rolling 1-year return: best | +94.84% | +15.19% |
| Share of 1-year periods with a loss | 15.57% | 41.86% |
Against each fund's benchmark
| LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF | Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Beta ⓘ | 0.99 | 1.00 |
| Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ | +0.38% | +0.75% |
| R² ⓘ | 99.41 | 99.25 |
| Upside capture | 99.10% | 99.69% |
| Downside capture | 96.11% | 95.59% |
| Tracking error | 1.14% | 1.29% |
| Information ratio | 0.35 | 0.60 |
| Treynor ratio | 2.38 | -7.30 |
Portfolio
Asset mix
| LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF | Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 99.66% | 99.91% |
| Cash & equivalents | 0.32% | 0.07% |
Market-cap split (share of fund assets)
| LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF | Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 97.63% | 97.93% |
| Mid Cap | 2.03% | 1.98% |
| Small Cap | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Unclassified | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Concentration
| LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF | Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 42.03% | 42.39% |
| Effective number of stocks ⓘ | 36.6 | 36.1 |
| Securities held | 100 | 100 |
Portfolio overlap: 98.7%
100 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 98.7% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a high overlap: holding both adds little diversification beyond holding one.
| Held by both | LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF | Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| HDFC Bank Limited | 8.34% | 8.41% |
| ICICI Bank Limited | 7.28% | 7.34% |
| Reliance Industries Limited | 6.09% | 6.15% |
| Bharti Airtel Limited | 4.10% | 4.14% |
| Larsen & Toubro Limited | 3.38% | 3.41% |
| State Bank of India | 3.05% | 3.07% |
| Axis Bank Limited | 2.71% | 2.73% |
| Infosys Limited | 2.70% | 2.72% |
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited | 2.36% | 2.38% |
| Mahindra & Mahindra Limited | 2.02% | 2.04% |
| Bajaj Finance Limited | 2.02% | 2.03% |
| ITC Limited | 1.94% | 1.96% |
| Eternal Limited | 1.78% | 1.80% |
| Tata Consultancy Services Limited | 1.60% | 1.62% |
| Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited | 1.48% | 1.49% |
Top 10 holdings
LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF
- HDFC Bank Limited8.34%
- ICICI Bank Limited7.28%
- Reliance Industries Limited6.09%
- Bharti Airtel Limited4.10%
- Larsen & Toubro Limited3.38%
- State Bank of India3.05%
- Axis Bank Limited2.71%
- Infosys Limited2.70%
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited2.36%
- Mahindra & Mahindra Limited2.02%
Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF
- HDFC Bank Limited8.41%
- ICICI Bank Limited7.34%
- Reliance Industries Limited6.15%
- Bharti Airtel Limited4.14%
- Larsen & Toubro Limited3.41%
- State Bank of India3.07%
- Axis Bank Limited2.73%
- Infosys Limited2.72%
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited2.38%
- Mahindra & Mahindra Limited2.04%
Sector exposure
| LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF | Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 24.94% | 25.12% |
| Petroleum Products | 6.96% | 7.01% |
| IT - Software | 6.68% | 6.71% |
| Automobiles | 6.35% | 6.36% |
| Finance | 6.19% | 6.19% |
| Telecom - Services | 4.30% | 4.42% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 4.37% | 4.34% |
| Power | 3.91% | 3.89% |
| Construction | 3.38% | 3.41% |
| Diversified FMCG | 3.22% | 3.25% |
| Retailing | 2.94% | 2.95% |
| Ferrous Metals | 2.44% | 2.44% |
| Non - Ferrous Metals | 2.35% | 1.82% |
| Consumer Durables | 2.30% | 2.31% |
Questions people ask
What is the difference between LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF and Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF returns?
As of 5 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return −2.28% vs −2.02%; 3-year CAGR +10.72% vs —; 5-year CAGR +8.01% vs —; 10-year CAGR +12.35% vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.
How do LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF and Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF compare on risk?
Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 14.79% vs 15.12%; Sharpe ratio 0.29 vs -0.27; Sortino ratio 0.40 vs -0.35; maximum drawdown −38.01% vs −17.23%; beta 0.99 vs 1.00.
How much do LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF and Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF overlap?
By weight, 98.7% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 100 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being HDFC Bank Limited, ICICI Bank Limited, Reliance Industries Limited. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.
What is the large, mid and small cap split of LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF and Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF?
LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF: large cap 97.6%, mid cap 2.0%, small cap 0.0%. Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF: large cap 97.9%, mid cap 2.0%, small cap 0.0% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).
Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?
No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.
More comparisons
LIC MF Nifty 100 ETF vs
Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF vs
- Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF vs HDFC NIFTY 100 ETF
- Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF vs BANDHAN NIFTY 100 INDEX
- Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF vs Axis Nifty 100 Index
- Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF vs quant Nifty 100 Index
- Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF vs Nippon India ETF Nifty 100
- Zerodha CASE Nifty 100 ETF vs Motilal Oswal Nifty 100 ETF
All Nifty 100 Index Funds & ETFs comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →
Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 5 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.