LIC MF Value Fund vs Sundaram Value Fund
LIC MF Value Fund and Sundaram Value Fund are both Value / Contra funds. As of 5 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +17.55% vs +7.39%, 5-year CAGR — vs +7.26%, volatility 18.81% vs 14.34%, maximum drawdown −25.20% vs −41.31%. Their portfolios overlap by 15.1% (9 stocks held by both).
Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.
Key facts
| LIC MF Value | Sundaram Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | LIC Mutual Fund | Sundaram Mutual Fund |
| Compared as | Value / Contra | Value / Contra |
| NAV | ₹31.1221 | ₹221.2748 |
| NAV date | 5 Nov 2026 | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Launched (first NAV) | 31 Jul 2023 | 2 Jan 2013 |
| Track record | 3.3 yrs | 13.8 yrs |
| Fund size (AUM) | ₹336 Cr | ₹1,217 Cr |
| Securities held | 50 | 48 |
| Portfolio as of | 30 Sep 2026 | 30 Sep 2026 |
| Fund page | Full record → | Full record → |
Returns
| LIC MF Value | Sundaram Value | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −0.15% | +2.54% |
| 3 months | −2.00% | −3.83% |
| 6 months | +7.49% | −3.28% |
| 1 year | +17.47% | −7.20% |
| 3 years (CAGR) | +17.55% | +7.39% |
| 5 years (CAGR) | — | +7.26% |
| 7 years (CAGR) | — | +11.23% |
| 10 years (CAGR) | — | +10.17% |
| Since launch (CAGR) | +16.80% | +11.56% |
| SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ | — | +5.81% |
Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.
Calendar-year returns
| LIC MF Value | Sundaram Value | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (year to date) | +17.70% | −8.70% |
| 2025 | −5.73% | +7.67% |
| 2024 | +30.38% | +12.66% |
| 2023 | — | +23.99% |
| 2022 | — | +4.71% |
| 2021 | — | +32.22% |
Risk
| LIC MF Value | Sundaram Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (annualised) ⓘ | 18.81% | 14.34% |
| Downside volatility ⓘ | 13.17% | 10.72% |
| Sharpe ratio ⓘ | 0.59 | 0.06 |
| Sortino ratio ⓘ | 0.84 | 0.08 |
| Maximum drawdown ⓘ | −25.20% | −41.31% |
| Recovery from that fall | 15 months | 9 months |
| Current fall from peak | −2.39% | −9.43% |
| Rolling 1-year return: worst | −11.01% | −35.29% |
| Rolling 1-year return: median | +12.71% | +10.23% |
| Rolling 1-year return: best | +47.61% | +89.83% |
| Share of 1-year periods with a loss | 25.44% | 19.65% |
Against each fund's benchmark
| LIC MF Value | Sundaram Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Beta ⓘ | 1.07 | 0.90 |
| Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ | +5.56% | −3.38% |
| R² ⓘ | 77.71 | 94.75 |
| Upside capture | 126.36% | 81.63% |
| Downside capture | 106.70% | 93.54% |
| Tracking error | 9.00% | 3.66% |
| Information ratio | 0.66 | -1.07 |
| Treynor ratio | 9.00 | -0.27 |
Portfolio
Asset mix
| LIC MF Value | Sundaram Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 96.99% | 98.93% |
| Cash & equivalents | 2.98% | 1.05% |
Market-cap split (share of fund assets)
| LIC MF Value | Sundaram Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 32.80% | 59.77% |
| Mid Cap | 10.57% | 13.59% |
| Small Cap | 42.05% | 25.58% |
| Unclassified | 11.57% | 0.00% |
Concentration
| LIC MF Value | Sundaram Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 38.78% | 43.62% |
| Effective number of stocks ⓘ | 36.4 | 33.4 |
| Securities held | 50 | 48 |
Portfolio overlap: 15.1%
9 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 15.1% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a low overlap: the two portfolios are largely different.
| Held by both | LIC MF Value | Sundaram Value |
|---|---|---|
| HDFC Bank Limited | 3.51% | 6.70% |
| State Bank of India | 1.87% | 4.10% |
| Tata Motors Ltd | 2.19% | 1.79% |
| NTPC Limited | 1.76% | 3.23% |
| ICICI Bank Limited | 1.67% | 5.75% |
| Cipla Limited | 1.50% | 1.26% |
| Axis Bank Limited | 1.25% | 5.04% |
| Tech Mahindra Limited | 1.33% | 1.13% |
| Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Ltd. | 0.91% | 2.77% |
Top 10 holdings
LIC MF Value
- INDO-MIM Ltd.7.68%
- Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Limited5.03%
- Kirloskar Brothers Limited3.60%
- HDFC Bank Limited3.51%
- National Stock Exchange Of India Ltd3.36%
- Schaeffler India Ltd.3.32%
- Nephrocare Health Services Ltd3.14%
- Hyundai Motor India Ltd.3.12%
- SML Mahindra Ltd.3.06%
- Saregama India Limited2.96%
Sundaram Value
- HDFC Bank Limited6.70%
- ICICI Bank Limited5.75%
- Reliance Industries Limited5.17%
- Axis Bank Limited5.04%
- Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited4.39%
- State Bank of India4.10%
- Infosys Limited3.27%
- NTPC Limited3.23%
- Larsen & Toubro Limited3.09%
- Bharti Airtel Limited2.89%
Sector exposure
| LIC MF Value | Sundaram Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 10.29% | 26.90% |
| Auto Components | 13.38% | 4.67% |
| Industrial Products | 9.08% | 4.39% |
| Automobiles | 8.15% | 2.77% |
| Industrial Manufacturing | 8.11% | 0.00% |
| IT - Software | 3.28% | 6.92% |
| Petroleum Products | 0.00% | 6.26% |
| Agricultural, Commercial & Construction Vehicles | 5.25% | 3.31% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 5.15% | 4.70% |
| Power | 3.35% | 4.87% |
| Textiles & Apparels | 3.87% | 0.00% |
| Electrical Equipment | 3.67% | 0.00% |
| Gas | 1.78% | 3.67% |
| Capital Markets | 3.36% | 0.00% |
Questions people ask
What is the difference between LIC MF Value and Sundaram Value returns?
As of 5 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +17.47% vs −7.20%; 3-year CAGR +17.55% vs +7.39%; 5-year CAGR — vs +7.26%; 10-year CAGR — vs +10.17%. Past returns do not indicate future returns.
How do LIC MF Value and Sundaram Value compare on risk?
Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 18.81% vs 14.34%; Sharpe ratio 0.59 vs 0.06; Sortino ratio 0.84 vs 0.08; maximum drawdown −25.20% vs −41.31%; beta 1.07 vs 0.90.
How much do LIC MF Value and Sundaram Value overlap?
By weight, 15.1% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 9 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being HDFC Bank Limited, State Bank of India, Tata Motors Ltd. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.
What is the large, mid and small cap split of LIC MF Value and Sundaram Value?
LIC MF Value: large cap 32.8%, mid cap 10.6%, small cap 42.1%. Sundaram Value: large cap 59.8%, mid cap 13.6%, small cap 25.6% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).
Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?
No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.
More comparisons
LIC MF Value vs
All Value / Contra comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →
Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 5 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.