MF Analyser

Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund vs quant BFSI Fund

Motilal Oswal Financial Services Fund and quant BFSI Fund are both Banking & Financial Services Funds. As of 5 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR — vs +21.53%, 5-year CAGR — vs —, volatility — vs 19.88%, maximum drawdown −11.39% vs −22.34%. Their portfolios overlap by 9.7% (3 stocks held by both).

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

Motilal Oswal Financial Servicesquant BFSI
Fund houseMotilal Oswal Mutual Fundquant Mutual Fund
Compared asBanking & Financial Services FundsBanking & Financial Services Funds
NAV₹10.9474₹21.1400
NAV date5 Nov 20265 Nov 2026
Launched (first NAV)20 Feb 202621 Jun 2023
Track record0.7 yrs3.4 yrs
Fund size (AUM)₹209 Cr₹894 Cr
Securities held2923
Portfolio as of30 Sep 202630 Sep 2026
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

Motilal Oswal Financial Servicesquant BFSI
1 month+4.91%+2.23%
3 months+0.24%−2.48%
6 months+6.70%+4.14%
1 year—+10.43%
3 years (CAGR)—+21.53%
5 years (CAGR)——
7 years (CAGR)——
10 years (CAGR)——
Since launch (CAGR)—+24.78%
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ——

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

Motilal Oswal Financial Servicesquant BFSI
2026 (year to date)—+4.76%
2025—+26.50%
2024—+14.77%

Risk

Motilal Oswal Financial Servicesquant BFSI
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ—19.88%
Downside volatility ⓘ—13.06%
Sharpe ratio ⓘ—0.76
Sortino ratio ⓘ—1.15
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−11.39%−22.34%
Recovery from that fall1 months4 months
Current fall from peak−0.74%−4.80%
Rolling 1-year return: worst—−12.79%
Rolling 1-year return: median—+19.06%
Rolling 1-year return: best—+73.63%
Share of 1-year periods with a loss—12.73%

Against each fund's benchmark

Motilal Oswal Financial Servicesquant BFSI
Beta ⓘ—1.08
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ—+6.98%
R² ⓘ—75.00
Upside capture—126.67%
Downside capture—97.43%
Tracking error—9.86%
Information ratio—0.76
Treynor ratio—10.36

Portfolio

Asset mix

Motilal Oswal Financial Servicesquant BFSI
Equity88.91%70.07%
Cash & equivalents11.09%0.05%
Derivatives0.00%8.35%
Debt0.00%7.44%

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

Motilal Oswal Financial Servicesquant BFSI
Large Cap43.39%21.78%
Mid Cap21.44%19.32%
Small Cap20.03%28.96%
Unclassified4.05%0.00%

Concentration

Motilal Oswal Financial Servicesquant BFSI
Top 10 holdings45.22%82.89%
Effective number of stocks ⓘ30.813.7
Securities held2923

Portfolio overlap: 9.7%

3 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 9.7% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a low overlap: the two portfolios are largely different.

Held by bothMotilal Oswal Financial Servicesquant BFSI
Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited5.75%7.79%
ICICI Bank Limited6.31%1.98%
Piramal Finance Limited1.95%9.05%

Top 10 holdings

Motilal Oswal Financial Services

  1. State Bank of India6.56%
  2. ICICI Bank Limited6.31%
  3. Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited5.75%
  4. Bajaj Finance Limited4.69%
  5. One 97 Communications Limited3.89%
  6. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited3.86%
  7. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd3.82%
  8. IndusInd Bank Limited3.58%
  9. HDFC Bank Limited3.39%
  10. RBL Bank Limited3.37%

quant BFSI

  1. ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited10.28%
  2. Capri Global Capital Limited9.60%
  3. Life Insurance Corporation Of India9.52%
  4. LIC Housing Finance Limited9.18%
  5. Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited9.12%
  6. Piramal Finance Limited9.05%
  7. TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 108.17%
  8. Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited7.78%
  9. The Karnataka Bank Limited5.24%
  10. TSF INVESTMENTS LIMITED4.94%

Sector exposure

Motilal Oswal Financial Servicesquant BFSI
Banks38.73%7.22%
Finance26.51%33.33%
Capital Markets15.28%27.18%
Insurance2.28%10.68%
N.A.0.00%8.17%
Financial Technology (Fintech)6.11%0.00%
SOV0.00%5.88%
Sovereign0.00%1.56%

Questions people ask

What is the difference between Motilal Oswal Financial Services and quant BFSI returns?

As of 5 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return — vs +10.43%; 3-year CAGR — vs +21.53%; 5-year CAGR — vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do Motilal Oswal Financial Services and quant BFSI compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) — vs 19.88%; Sharpe ratio — vs 0.76; Sortino ratio — vs 1.15; maximum drawdown −11.39% vs −22.34%; beta — vs 1.08.

How much do Motilal Oswal Financial Services and quant BFSI overlap?

By weight, 9.7% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 3 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited, ICICI Bank Limited, Piramal Finance Limited. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.

What is the large, mid and small cap split of Motilal Oswal Financial Services and quant BFSI?

Motilal Oswal Financial Services: large cap 43.4%, mid cap 21.4%, small cap 20.0%. quant BFSI: large cap 21.8%, mid cap 19.3%, small cap 29.0% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Banking & Financial Services Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 5 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.