MF Analyser

Nippon India ETF Gold BeES vs Zerodha CASE Gold ETF

Nippon India ETF Gold BeES and Zerodha CASE Gold ETF are both Gold Index Funds & ETFs. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +30.81% vs —, 5-year CAGR +23.04% vs —, volatility 20.51% vs 21.12%, maximum drawdown −22.28% vs −22.49%.

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

Nippon India ETF Gold BeESZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Fund houseNippon India Mutual FundZerodha CASE Mutual Fund
Compared asGold Index Funds & ETFsGold Index Funds & ETFs
NAV₹115.9743₹22.4209
NAV date6 Nov 20265 Nov 2026
Launched (first NAV)7 Nov 201629 Feb 2024
Track record10.0 yrs2.7 yrs
Fund size (AUM)——
Securities held——
Portfolio as ofNot disclosed yetNot disclosed yet
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

Nippon India ETF Gold BeESZerodha CASE Gold ETF
1 month−4.03%−3.11%
3 months−5.58%−3.32%
6 months−6.59%−5.19%
1 year+16.16%+18.52%
3 years (CAGR)+30.81%—
5 years (CAGR)+23.04%—
7 years (CAGR)+19.14%—
10 years (CAGR)——
Since launch (CAGR)+15.22%+35.13%
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ+26.31%—

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

Nippon India ETF Gold BeESZerodha CASE Gold ETF
2026 (year to date)+5.52%+7.35%
2025+71.97%+72.09%
2024+19.37%—
2023+12.74%—
2022+13.96%—
2021−4.78%—

Risk

Nippon India ETF Gold BeESZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ20.51%21.12%
Downside volatility ⓘ9.73%9.98%
Sharpe ratio ⓘ1.191.36
Sortino ratio ⓘ2.502.87
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−22.28%−22.49%
Recovery from that fall——
Current fall from peak−19.78%−18.67%
Rolling 1-year return: worst−17.73%+11.36%
Rolling 1-year return: median+15.64%+47.78%
Rolling 1-year return: best+113.43%+114.39%
Share of 1-year periods with a loss9.68%0.00%

Against each fund's benchmark

Nippon India ETF Gold BeESZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Beta ⓘ0.060.12
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ+21.99%+26.20%
R² ⓘ0.210.62
Upside capture55.52%72.04%
Downside capture-102.88%-105.39%
Tracking error24.74%24.91%
Information ratio0.881.29
Treynor ratio376.88243.13

Portfolio

Nippon India ETF Gold BeES has no usable portfolio disclosure on file yet, so portfolio comparisons are shown only where available.

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

Nippon India ETF Gold BeESZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Large Cap——
Mid Cap——
Small Cap——
Unclassified——

Concentration

Nippon India ETF Gold BeESZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Top 10 holdings——
Effective number of stocks ⓘ——
Securities held——

Questions people ask

What is the difference between Nippon India ETF Gold BeES and Zerodha CASE Gold ETF returns?

As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +16.16% vs +18.52%; 3-year CAGR +30.81% vs —; 5-year CAGR +23.04% vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do Nippon India ETF Gold BeES and Zerodha CASE Gold ETF compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 20.51% vs 21.12%; Sharpe ratio 1.19 vs 1.36; Sortino ratio 2.50 vs 2.87; maximum drawdown −22.28% vs −22.49%; beta 0.06 vs 0.12.

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Gold Index Funds & ETFs comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.