quant BFSI Fund vs UTI - Banking and Financial Services Fund
quant BFSI Fund and UTI - Banking and Financial Services Fund are both Banking & Financial Services Funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +21.14% vs +14.86%, 5-year CAGR — vs +11.44%, volatility 19.84% vs 16.62%, maximum drawdown −22.34% vs −49.00%. Their portfolios overlap by 4.5% (4 stocks held by both).
Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.
Key facts
| quant BFSI | UTI - Banking and Financial Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | quant Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
| Compared as | Banking & Financial Services Funds | Banking & Financial Services Funds |
| NAV | ₹21.0789 | ₹233.5108 |
| NAV date | 6 Nov 2026 | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Launched (first NAV) | 21 Jun 2023 | 2 Jan 2013 |
| Track record | 3.4 yrs | 13.8 yrs |
| Fund size (AUM) | ₹894 Cr | — |
| Securities held | 23 | 37 |
| Portfolio as of | 30 Sep 2026 | 30 Sep 2026 |
| Fund page | Full record → | Full record → |
Returns
| quant BFSI | UTI - Banking and Financial Services | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +2.25% | +7.23% |
| 3 months | −2.09% | +2.55% |
| 6 months | +2.83% | +6.56% |
| 1 year | +10.33% | +5.19% |
| 3 years (CAGR) | +21.14% | +14.86% |
| 5 years (CAGR) | — | +11.44% |
| 7 years (CAGR) | — | +12.03% |
| 10 years (CAGR) | — | +11.54% |
| Since launch (CAGR) | +24.65% | +11.79% |
| SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ | — | +13.36% |
Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.
Calendar-year returns
| quant BFSI | UTI - Banking and Financial Services | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (year to date) | +4.46% | +2.82% |
| 2025 | +26.50% | +17.53% |
| 2024 | +14.77% | +12.26% |
| 2023 | — | +20.81% |
| 2022 | — | +16.45% |
| 2021 | — | +15.53% |
Risk
| quant BFSI | UTI - Banking and Financial Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (annualised) ⓘ | 19.84% | 16.62% |
| Downside volatility ⓘ | 13.06% | 11.02% |
| Sharpe ratio ⓘ | 0.74 | 0.50 |
| Sortino ratio ⓘ | 1.12 | 0.76 |
| Maximum drawdown ⓘ | −22.34% | −49.00% |
| Recovery from that fall | 4 months | 10 months |
| Current fall from peak | −5.08% | −1.21% |
| Rolling 1-year return: worst | −12.79% | −46.75% |
| Rolling 1-year return: median | +19.06% | +13.39% |
| Rolling 1-year return: best | +73.63% | +100.86% |
| Share of 1-year periods with a loss | 12.73% | 21.14% |
Against each fund's benchmark
| quant BFSI | UTI - Banking and Financial Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Beta ⓘ | 1.08 | 0.92 |
| Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ | +6.98% | +2.11% |
| R² ⓘ | 75.00 | 79.66 |
| Upside capture | 126.67% | 98.27% |
| Downside capture | 97.43% | 85.52% |
| Tracking error | 9.86% | 7.37% |
| Information ratio | 0.76 | 0.25 |
| Treynor ratio | 10.36 | 6.02 |
Portfolio
Asset mix
| quant BFSI | UTI - Banking and Financial Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 70.07% | 98.73% |
| Derivatives | 8.35% | 0.00% |
| Debt | 7.44% | 0.00% |
| Cash & equivalents | 0.05% | 1.27% |
Market-cap split (share of fund assets)
| quant BFSI | UTI - Banking and Financial Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 21.78% | 78.21% |
| Mid Cap | 19.32% | 9.91% |
| Small Cap | 28.96% | 9.96% |
| Unclassified | 0.00% | 0.65% |
Concentration
| quant BFSI | UTI - Banking and Financial Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 82.89% | 77.05% |
| Effective number of stocks ⓘ | 13.7 | 12.3 |
| Securities held | 23 | 37 |
Portfolio overlap: 4.5%
4 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 4.5% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a low overlap: the two portfolios are largely different.
| Held by both | quant BFSI | UTI - Banking and Financial Services |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Bank Limited | 1.98% | 10.37% |
| Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited | 7.79% | 1.06% |
| Life Insurance Corporation Of India | 9.52% | 0.99% |
| ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | 10.28% | 0.47% |
Top 10 holdings
quant BFSI
- ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited10.28%
- Capri Global Capital Limited9.60%
- Life Insurance Corporation Of India9.52%
- LIC Housing Finance Limited9.18%
- Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited9.12%
- Piramal Finance Limited9.05%
- TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 108.17%
- Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited7.78%
- The Karnataka Bank Limited5.24%
- TSF INVESTMENTS LIMITED4.94%
UTI - Banking and Financial Services
- HDFC Bank Limited17.60%
- ICICI Bank Limited10.37%
- State Bank of India9.98%
- Axis Bank Limited9.93%
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited9.89%
- Bajaj Finance Limited5.07%
- Shriram Finance Limited4.61%
- Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Limited3.93%
- SBI Life Insurance Company Limited3.89%
- ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited1.78%
Sector exposure
| quant BFSI | UTI - Banking and Financial Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 7.22% | 64.53% |
| Finance | 33.33% | 17.96% |
| Capital Markets | 27.18% | 5.31% |
| Insurance | 10.68% | 9.46% |
| N.A. | 8.17% | 0.00% |
| SOV | 5.88% | 0.00% |
| Sovereign | 1.56% | 0.00% |
| Financial Technology (Fintech) | 0.00% | 1.47% |
Questions people ask
What is the difference between quant BFSI and UTI - Banking and Financial Services returns?
As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +10.33% vs +5.19%; 3-year CAGR +21.14% vs +14.86%; 5-year CAGR — vs +11.44%; 10-year CAGR — vs +11.54%. Past returns do not indicate future returns.
How do quant BFSI and UTI - Banking and Financial Services compare on risk?
Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 19.84% vs 16.62%; Sharpe ratio 0.74 vs 0.50; Sortino ratio 1.12 vs 0.76; maximum drawdown −22.34% vs −49.00%; beta 1.08 vs 0.92.
How much do quant BFSI and UTI - Banking and Financial Services overlap?
By weight, 4.5% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 4 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being ICICI Bank Limited, Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited, Life Insurance Corporation Of India. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.
What is the large, mid and small cap split of quant BFSI and UTI - Banking and Financial Services?
quant BFSI: large cap 21.8%, mid cap 19.3%, small cap 29.0%. UTI - Banking and Financial Services: large cap 78.2%, mid cap 9.9%, small cap 10.0% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).
Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?
No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.
More comparisons
quant BFSI vs
- quant BFSI vs ITI Banking and Financial Services
- quant BFSI vs SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES
- quant BFSI vs Aditya Birla Sun Life Financial Services Sectoral Debt
- quant BFSI vs Baroda BNP Paribas Banking and Financial Services
- quant BFSI vs Helios Financial Services
- quant BFSI vs MahindraManulife Banking & Financial Services
UTI - Banking and Financial Services vs
- UTI - Banking and Financial Services vs Mirae Asset Banking and Financial Services
- UTI - Banking and Financial Services vs UTI Financial Services Debt
- UTI - Banking and Financial Services vs Bank of India Business Cycle
- UTI - Banking and Financial Services vs Edelweiss Financial Services
- UTI - Banking and Financial Services vs ITI Banking and Financial Services
- UTI - Banking and Financial Services vs SBI BANKING & FINANCIAL SERVICES
All Banking & Financial Services Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →
Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.