MF Analyser

Taurus Banking & Financial Services Fund vs UTI Financial Services Debt Fund

Taurus Banking & Financial Services Fund and UTI Financial Services Debt Fund are both Banking & Financial Services Funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +10.19% vs —, 5-year CAGR +8.86% vs —, volatility 15.42% vs —, maximum drawdown −41.62% vs —.

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

Taurus Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Fund houseTaurus Mutual FundUTI Mutual Fund
Compared asBanking & Financial Services FundsBanking & Financial Services Funds
NAV₹61.2100—
NAV date6 Nov 2026—
Launched (first NAV)3 Jan 2013—
Track record13.8 yrs—
Fund size (AUM)₹10 Cr—
Securities held26—
Portfolio as of30 Sep 2026Not disclosed yet
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

Taurus Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
1 month+6.79%—
3 months+1.63%—
6 months+2.89%—
1 year−0.84%—
3 years (CAGR)+10.19%—
5 years (CAGR)+8.86%—
7 years (CAGR)+10.79%—
10 years (CAGR)+12.98%—
Since launch (CAGR)+11.32%—
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ+9.37%—

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

Taurus Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
2026 (year to date)−0.78%—
2025+11.88%—
2024+9.40%—
2023+16.88%—
2022+18.72%—
2021+12.24%—

Risk

Taurus Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ15.42%—
Downside volatility ⓘ10.22%—
Sharpe ratio ⓘ0.24—
Sortino ratio ⓘ0.36—
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−41.62%—
Recovery from that fall9 months—
Current fall from peak−3.06%—
Rolling 1-year return: worst−33.38%—
Rolling 1-year return: median+13.10%—
Rolling 1-year return: best+86.48%—
Share of 1-year periods with a loss19.46%—

Against each fund's benchmark

Taurus Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Beta ⓘ0.87—
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ−1.65%—
R² ⓘ84.11—
Upside capture86.87%—
Downside capture92.08%—
Tracking error6.26%—
Information ratio-0.36—
Treynor ratio1.62—

Portfolio

UTI Financial Services Debt Fund has no usable portfolio disclosure on file yet, so portfolio comparisons are shown only where available.

Asset mix

Taurus Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Equity96.52%—
Cash & equivalents3.48%—

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

Taurus Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Large Cap74.24%—
Mid Cap5.35%—
Small Cap16.93%—
Unclassified0.00%—

Concentration

Taurus Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Top 10 holdings73.58%—
Effective number of stocks ⓘ12.7—
Securities held26—

Top 10 holdings

Taurus Banking & Financial Services

  1. ICICI Bank Limited16.80%
  2. HDFC Bank Limited13.67%
  3. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited8.51%
  4. State Bank of India8.26%
  5. Axis Bank Limited8.15%
  6. DAM Capital Advisors Limited4.44%
  7. Bajaj Finance Limited4.13%
  8. General Insurance Corporation of India3.42%
  9. Bajaj Holdings & Investment Ltd.3.10%
  10. Power Finance Corporation Limited3.10%

UTI Financial Services Debt

Not disclosed yet.

Sector exposure

Taurus Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Banks57.76%—
Finance18.23%—
Capital Markets14.45%—
Insurance5.27%—
Financial Technology (Fintech)0.81%—

Questions people ask

What is the difference between Taurus Banking & Financial Services and UTI Financial Services Debt returns?

As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return −0.84% vs —; 3-year CAGR +10.19% vs —; 5-year CAGR +8.86% vs —; 10-year CAGR +12.98% vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do Taurus Banking & Financial Services and UTI Financial Services Debt compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 15.42% vs —; Sharpe ratio 0.24 vs —; Sortino ratio 0.36 vs —; maximum drawdown −41.62% vs —; beta 0.87 vs —.

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Banking & Financial Services Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.