Event and reporting period: Five trading sessions, 2–6 November 2026; analysis checked 9 November · Analysis checked: 9 November 2026.
Foreign institutional investors were net buyers of ₹45,960.02 crore in the five cash-market sessions from 2 to 6 November 2026. Domestic institutions were net sellers of ₹24,196.52 crore. The two figures do not cancel each other out: together they leave positive net buying of ₹21,763.50 crore across those reported investor categories.
That is a dated weekly observation, not a forecast for the next session. It also is not ₹45,960 crore of newly created stock-market wealth. Cash-market trading flows, changes in market capitalisation and the fresh issuance of securities are different measures. Keeping those definitions separate is the first useful step in reading the week.
Rebuild the week from the daily records
| Session, November 2026 | FII/FPI net, ₹ crore | DII net, ₹ crore | Combined, calculated ₹ crore |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 November | +3,114.68 | −392.20 | +2,722.48 |
| 3 November | +6,836.81 | −3,678.85 | +3,157.96 |
| 4 November | +7,284.03 | −3,712.23 | +3,571.80 |
| 5 November | +14,974.68 | −10,444.54 | +4,530.14 |
| 6 November | +13,749.82 | −5,968.70 | +7,781.12 |
| Five-session total | +45,960.02 | −24,196.52 | +21,763.50 |
Source: Upstox — dated cash-market buy, sell and net records for 2–6 November 2026.
Source: EquityPandit — dated institutional cash activity and November totals through 6 November.
The dated records reproduce the provisional exchange cash-market series; NSE's page provides its series definition. DD News reports rounded weekly foreign buying of ₹45,960 crore and domestic selling of ₹24,197 crore. Adding rounded totals can differ slightly from summing the underlying two-decimal daily records. Our table retains the dated precision and shows its calculation.
Source: NSE — provisional FII/FPI and DII cash-market activity; series definitions.
Source: DD News — weekly foreign buying and domestic selling, 2–6 November 2026.
Foreign net buying accelerated late in the week
₹ crore
| Label | Value (₹ crore) |
|---|---|
| 2 Nov | 3114.68 |
| 3 Nov | 6836.81 |
| 4 Nov | 7284.03 |
| 5 Nov | 14974.68 |
| 6 Nov | 13749.82 |
Thursday and Friday together contributed ₹28,724.50 crore of foreign net buying, approximately 62.50% of the week's total. The activity was therefore concentrated late in the week. That is a descriptive concentration measure, not proof of why investors bought or whether the flow will persist.
Domestic selling offset about half the foreign buying
Divide ₹24,196.52 crore of DII net selling by ₹45,960.02 crore of foreign net buying. The ratio is about 52.65%. Roughly 47.35% remains in the combined net figure for these categories. Both percentages describe the arithmetic relationship of the week's net flows.
They do not identify a one-to-one trade between every foreign buyer and a domestic institution. Other investor categories also transact, and exchange trades have counterparties. Institutional classification is not a full map of who sold each specific stock to whom.
Nor does DII selling prove that domestic mutual-fund investors stopped their SIPs. The DII category includes more than one type of institution, and fund managers can buy some securities while selling others. Investor subscriptions, redemptions, cash balances and portfolio transactions require their own data.
Friday's net number contains two large gross numbers
On 6 November, the dated records show foreign gross purchases of ₹30,455.63 crore and gross sales of ₹16,705.81 crore. Their difference is ₹13,749.82 crore. Domestic institutions bought ₹18,084.32 crore and sold ₹24,053.02 crore, leaving negative ₹5,968.70 crore.
Calling ₹13,749.82 crore the value of everything foreigners bought would understate the gross purchase activity. Calling ₹30,455.63 crore the net inflow would overstate it. Netting is useful precisely because participants can trade heavily on both sides during the same session.
Friday's combined figure of ₹7,781.12 crore was larger than Thursday's ₹4,530.14 crore even though Friday's foreign buying was smaller. The reason is that domestic selling eased by more than foreign net buying declined. The combined picture therefore cannot be read from only the FII headline.
Do not mix a week, a month and a 14-session streak
The five-session period starts on Monday 2 November and ends on Friday 6 November. The ₹53,154 crore figure in the accompanying Economic Times report refers to a longer period beginning 16 October, not this week alone. A longer-period total should not be placed beside a one-week DII total as though they cover the same window.
Source: Economic Times — 6 November FII net buying and DII net selling, dated market report.
At this early point in November, a month-to-date table can happen to match the first five sessions, but that coincidence will end as more sessions are added. A live data page may later show a larger monthly total. The dated weekly table remains the relevant record for this analysis.
Likewise, provisional exchange cash-market activity is not interchangeable with final custodian or depository FPI flows across all routes and asset classes. Timing, coverage and revisions can differ. A discrepancy is a prompt to check definitions, rather than automatic evidence that one entire dataset is wrong.
What can the flows actually tell an investor?
The figures establish a meaningful reversal in the balance of buying and selling by the reported categories during this window. They can help explain market context. They cannot independently identify fair value, future earnings or the next market return. Buying can follow a rally as well as contribute to price pressure.
To make a stronger claim about sector rotation, one needs sector or security-level evidence. An aggregate foreign net purchase does not prove that every bank, technology stock or small-cap company received inflows. We therefore do not attach unsupported sector winners to this total.
For mutual-fund investors, compare portfolio holdings, concentration and the investment horizon before changing a SIP in response to a single week. A regular contribution plan is not made suitable or unsuitable by one institutional-flow observation. Valuation, financial goals and the capacity to hold through reversals remain separate inputs.
The useful takeaway is concrete: foreign net buying was large, domestic net selling offset about half of it, and Friday's combined institutional balance strengthened despite a smaller foreign number. The daily reconciliation shows exactly what happened without turning the historical record into a promise about next week.
Questions readers ask
Did foreign investors buy only ₹13,749.82 crore on Friday?
That was net buying. Dated gross purchases were ₹30,455.63 crore and gross sales ₹16,705.81 crore.
Was ₹53,154 crore the weekly foreign total?
No. That reported figure covers a longer streak beginning 16 October. The 2–6 November total used here is ₹45,960.02 crore.
Does aggregate FII buying prove a particular sector was bought?
No. Sector or stock-level data are needed. Aggregate cash-market flows cannot establish that every sector or stock benefited.
Connect the event to your own funds
Use MF Analyser research to check the relevant scheme, its disclosed holdings and the date of that disclosure. A company or policy headline reaches a portfolio through its actual positions and weights. Several funds can repeat the same underlying exposure, so count the combined position before treating the headline as a reason to change investments.
THE READING ROOM