MF Analyser

Bank of India Business Cycle Fund vs UTI Financial Services Debt Fund

Bank of India Business Cycle Fund and UTI Financial Services Debt Fund are both Banking & Financial Services Funds. As of 5 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR — vs —, 5-year CAGR — vs —, volatility 19.52% vs —, maximum drawdown −25.21% vs —.

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

Bank of India Business CycleUTI Financial Services Debt
Fund houseBank of India Mutual FundUTI Mutual Fund
Compared asBanking & Financial Services FundsBanking & Financial Services Funds
NAV₹9.8200—
NAV date5 Nov 2026—
Launched (first NAV)2 Sep 2024—
Track record2.2 yrs—
Fund size (AUM)₹437 Cr—
Securities held51—
Portfolio as of30 Sep 2026Not disclosed yet
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

Bank of India Business CycleUTI Financial Services Debt
1 month+0.10%—
3 months−0.71%—
6 months+2.83%—
1 year+2.61%—
3 years (CAGR)——
5 years (CAGR)——
7 years (CAGR)——
10 years (CAGR)——
Since launch (CAGR)−0.92%—
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ——

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

Bank of India Business CycleUTI Financial Services Debt
2026 (year to date)+7.56%—
2025−7.40%—

Risk

Bank of India Business CycleUTI Financial Services Debt
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ19.52%—
Downside volatility ⓘ14.49%—
Sharpe ratio ⓘ-0.38—
Sortino ratio ⓘ-0.51—
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−25.21%—
Recovery from that fall——
Current fall from peak−6.21%—
Rolling 1-year return: worst−13.31%—
Rolling 1-year return: median+1.69%—
Rolling 1-year return: best+12.64%—
Share of 1-year periods with a loss43.30%—

Against each fund's benchmark

Bank of India Business CycleUTI Financial Services Debt
Beta ⓘ1.05—
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ+1.49%—
R² ⓘ76.63—
Upside capture124.48%—
Downside capture116.77%—
Tracking error9.52%—
Information ratio0.05—
Treynor ratio-9.54—

Portfolio

UTI Financial Services Debt Fund has no usable portfolio disclosure on file yet, so portfolio comparisons are shown only where available.

Asset mix

Bank of India Business CycleUTI Financial Services Debt
Equity94.71%—
Cash & equivalents5.23%—
Debt0.06%—

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

Bank of India Business CycleUTI Financial Services Debt
Large Cap43.94%—
Mid Cap15.89%—
Small Cap28.33%—
Unclassified6.55%—

Concentration

Bank of India Business CycleUTI Financial Services Debt
Top 10 holdings36.43%—
Effective number of stocks ⓘ41.9—
Securities held51—

Top 10 holdings

Bank of India Business Cycle

  1. ICICI Bank Limited5.41%
  2. State Bank of India5.07%
  3. NTPC Limited4.16%
  4. Bharti Airtel Limited3.78%
  5. Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited3.36%
  6. Quality Power Electrical Eqp Ltd3.19%
  7. LG Electronics India Ltd3.03%
  8. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited2.94%
  9. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited2.82%
  10. Sky Gold And Diamonds Limited2.67%

UTI Financial Services Debt

Not disclosed yet.

Sector exposure

Bank of India Business CycleUTI Financial Services Debt
Banks12.75%—
Consumer Durables11.81%—
Power8.84%—
Electrical Equipment7.96%—
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology5.63%—
Capital Markets4.86%—
Food Products4.00%—
Textiles & Apparels3.82%—
Telecom - Services3.78%—
Industrial Products3.37%—
Healthcare Services3.36%—
Automobiles3.15%—
Aerospace & Defense2.58%—
Auto Components2.57%—

Questions people ask

What is the difference between Bank of India Business Cycle and UTI Financial Services Debt returns?

As of 5 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +2.61% vs —; 3-year CAGR — vs —; 5-year CAGR — vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do Bank of India Business Cycle and UTI Financial Services Debt compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 19.52% vs —; Sharpe ratio -0.38 vs —; Sortino ratio -0.51 vs —; maximum drawdown −25.21% vs —; beta 1.05 vs —.

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Banking & Financial Services Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 5 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.