MF Analyser

Bank of India Consumption Fund vs UTI Financial Services Debt Fund

Bank of India Consumption Fund and UTI Financial Services Debt Fund are both Banking & Financial Services Funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR — vs —, 5-year CAGR — vs —, volatility 16.62% vs —, maximum drawdown −15.16% vs —.

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

Bank of India ConsumptionUTI Financial Services Debt
Fund houseBank of India Mutual FundUTI Mutual Fund
Compared asBanking & Financial Services FundsBanking & Financial Services Funds
NAV₹11.4200—
NAV date6 Nov 2026—
Launched (first NAV)23 Dec 2024—
Track record1.9 yrs—
Fund size (AUM)₹346 Cr—
Securities held38—
Portfolio as of30 Sep 2026Not disclosed yet
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

Bank of India ConsumptionUTI Financial Services Debt
1 month+4.87%—
3 months−1.21%—
6 months+5.74%—
1 year+0.88%—
3 years (CAGR)——
5 years (CAGR)——
7 years (CAGR)——
10 years (CAGR)——
Since launch (CAGR)+7.24%—
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ——

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

Bank of India ConsumptionUTI Financial Services Debt
2026 (year to date)+1.15%—
2025+12.67%—

Risk

Bank of India ConsumptionUTI Financial Services Debt
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ16.62%—
Downside volatility ⓘ12.04%—
Sharpe ratio ⓘ0.04—
Sortino ratio ⓘ0.06—
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−15.16%—
Recovery from that fall4 months—
Current fall from peak−2.23%—
Rolling 1-year return: worst−8.07%—
Rolling 1-year return: median+3.66%—
Rolling 1-year return: best+16.83%—
Share of 1-year periods with a loss20.83%—

Against each fund's benchmark

Bank of India ConsumptionUTI Financial Services Debt
Beta ⓘ0.90—
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ+3.47%—
R² ⓘ85.18—
Upside capture106.38%—
Downside capture87.26%—
Tracking error6.52%—
Information ratio0.63—
Treynor ratio-2.98—

Portfolio

UTI Financial Services Debt Fund has no usable portfolio disclosure on file yet, so portfolio comparisons are shown only where available.

Asset mix

Bank of India ConsumptionUTI Financial Services Debt
Equity94.26%—
Cash & equivalents5.67%—
Debt0.07%—

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

Bank of India ConsumptionUTI Financial Services Debt
Large Cap43.73%—
Mid Cap23.41%—
Small Cap23.53%—
Unclassified3.59%—

Concentration

Bank of India ConsumptionUTI Financial Services Debt
Top 10 holdings52.24%—
Effective number of stocks ⓘ24.6—
Securities held38—

Top 10 holdings

Bank of India Consumption

  1. Bharti Airtel Limited9.71%
  2. ITC Limited8.85%
  3. Britannia Industries Ltd.6.48%
  4. Maruti Suzuki India Limited5.30%
  5. Mahindra & Mahindra Limited4.66%
  6. United Spirits Limited4.52%
  7. Dixon Technologies (India) Limited3.82%
  8. Tips Music Limited3.07%
  9. FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited2.93%
  10. Entero Healthcare Solutions Ltd2.90%

UTI Financial Services Debt

Not disclosed yet.

Sector exposure

Bank of India ConsumptionUTI Financial Services Debt
Consumer Durables12.12%—
Telecom - Services12.05%—
Retailing11.03%—
Diversified FMCG10.70%—
Automobiles9.96%—
Food Products6.48%—
Auto Components5.46%—
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology4.85%—
Beverages4.52%—
Entertainment3.07%—
Personal Products2.36%—
Financial Technology (Fintech)2.15%—
Cigarettes & Tobacco Products1.98%—
Power1.97%—

Questions people ask

What is the difference between Bank of India Consumption and UTI Financial Services Debt returns?

As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +0.88% vs —; 3-year CAGR — vs —; 5-year CAGR — vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do Bank of India Consumption and UTI Financial Services Debt compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 16.62% vs —; Sharpe ratio 0.04 vs —; Sortino ratio 0.06 vs —; maximum drawdown −15.16% vs —; beta 0.90 vs —.

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Banking & Financial Services Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.