MF Analyser

DSP Gold ETF vs Zerodha CASE Gold ETF

DSP Gold ETF and Zerodha CASE Gold ETF are both Gold Index Funds & ETFs. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +30.70% vs —, 5-year CAGR — vs —, volatility 20.38% vs 21.12%, maximum drawdown −22.31% vs −22.49%.

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

DSP Gold ETFZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Fund houseDSP Mutual FundZerodha CASE Mutual Fund
Compared asGold Index Funds & ETFsGold Index Funds & ETFs
NAV₹13.6440₹22.4209
NAV date6 Nov 20265 Nov 2026
Launched (first NAV)28 Apr 202329 Feb 2024
Track record3.5 yrs2.7 yrs
Fund size (AUM)₹2,841 Cr—
Securities held1—
Portfolio as of30 Sep 2026Not disclosed yet
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

DSP Gold ETFZerodha CASE Gold ETF
1 month−3.98%−3.11%
3 months−6.09%−3.32%
6 months−7.01%−5.19%
1 year+15.75%+18.52%
3 years (CAGR)+30.70%—
5 years (CAGR)——
7 years (CAGR)——
10 years (CAGR)——
Since launch (CAGR)+26.08%+35.13%
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ——

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

DSP Gold ETFZerodha CASE Gold ETF
2026 (year to date)+5.13%+7.35%
2025+72.06%+72.09%
2024+19.44%—

Risk

DSP Gold ETFZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ20.38%21.12%
Downside volatility ⓘ9.76%9.98%
Sharpe ratio ⓘ1.191.36
Sortino ratio ⓘ2.482.87
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−22.31%−22.49%
Recovery from that fall——
Current fall from peak−20.02%−18.67%
Rolling 1-year return: worst+10.52%+11.36%
Rolling 1-year return: median+34.25%+47.78%
Rolling 1-year return: best+113.46%+114.39%
Share of 1-year periods with a loss0.00%0.00%

Against each fund's benchmark

DSP Gold ETFZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Beta ⓘ0.070.12
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ+21.87%+26.20%
R² ⓘ0.240.62
Upside capture56.46%72.04%
Downside capture-100.61%-105.39%
Tracking error24.59%24.91%
Information ratio0.881.29
Treynor ratio352.09243.13

Portfolio

Zerodha CASE Gold ETF has no usable portfolio disclosure on file yet, so portfolio comparisons are shown only where available.

Asset mix

DSP Gold ETFZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Foreign Securities97.93%—
Cash & equivalents2.07%—

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

DSP Gold ETFZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Large Cap0.00%—
Mid Cap0.00%—
Small Cap0.00%—
Unclassified0.00%—

Concentration

DSP Gold ETFZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Top 10 holdings97.93%—
Effective number of stocks ⓘ1—
Securities held1—

Top 10 holdings

DSP Gold ETF

  1. GOLD97.93%

Zerodha CASE Gold ETF

Not disclosed yet.

Sector exposure

DSP Gold ETFZerodha CASE Gold ETF
Unclassified97.93%—

Questions people ask

What is the difference between DSP Gold ETF and Zerodha CASE Gold ETF returns?

As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +15.75% vs +18.52%; 3-year CAGR +30.70% vs —; 5-year CAGR — vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do DSP Gold ETF and Zerodha CASE Gold ETF compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 20.38% vs 21.12%; Sharpe ratio 1.19 vs 1.36; Sortino ratio 2.48 vs 2.87; maximum drawdown −22.31% vs −22.49%; beta 0.07 vs 0.12.

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Gold Index Funds & ETFs comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.