Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid Fund and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund are both Aggressive Hybrid funds. As of 5 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +12.18% vs +10.35%, 5-year CAGR +11.47% vs +7.20%, volatility 11.46% vs 10.98%, maximum drawdown −28.59% vs −31.22%. Their portfolios overlap by 34% (29 stocks held by both).
Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.
Key facts
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | Edelweiss Mutual Fund | PGIM India Mutual Fund |
| Compared as | Aggressive Hybrid | Aggressive Hybrid |
| NAV | ₹64.7700 | ₹158.6300 |
| NAV date | 5 Nov 2026 | 5 Nov 2026 |
| Launched (first NAV) | 26 Jun 2009 | 8 Mar 2016 |
| Track record | 17.4 yrs | 10.7 yrs |
| Fund size (AUM) | ₹3,890 Cr | ₹193 Cr |
| Securities held | 108 | 70 |
| Portfolio as of | 30 Sep 2026 | 30 Sep 2026 |
| Fund page | Full record → | Full record → |
Returns
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +3.37% | +4.64% |
| 3 months | −1.02% | −0.41% |
| 6 months | +1.87% | +2.45% |
| 1 year | +1.12% | +0.06% |
| 3 years (CAGR) | +12.18% | +10.35% |
| 5 years (CAGR) | +11.47% | +7.20% |
| 7 years (CAGR) | +13.94% | +10.96% |
| 10 years (CAGR) | +12.27% | +9.90% |
| Since launch (CAGR) | +11.56% | +10.67% |
| SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ | +10.66% | +8.61% |
Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.
Calendar-year returns
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (year to date) | +0.65% | +0.63% |
| 2025 | +5.98% | +5.89% |
| 2024 | +20.14% | +16.18% |
| 2023 | +25.63% | +19.15% |
| 2022 | +5.45% | −2.30% |
| 2021 | +27.08% | +24.81% |
Risk
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity | |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (annualised) ⓘ | 11.46% | 10.98% |
| Downside volatility ⓘ | 8.04% | 7.43% |
| Sharpe ratio ⓘ | 0.50 | 0.35 |
| Sortino ratio ⓘ | 0.71 | 0.52 |
| Maximum drawdown ⓘ | −28.59% | −31.22% |
| Recovery from that fall | 8 months | 7 months |
| Current fall from peak | −1.08% | −1.24% |
| Rolling 1-year return: worst | −24.28% | −24.83% |
| Rolling 1-year return: median | +9.25% | +9.07% |
| Rolling 1-year return: best | +63.15% | +69.42% |
| Share of 1-year periods with a loss | 16.48% | 19.21% |
Against each fund's benchmark
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity | |
|---|---|---|
| Beta ⓘ | 0.76 | 0.70 |
| Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ | +2.65% | +0.93% |
| R² ⓘ | 93.57 | 88.25 |
| Upside capture | 88.11% | 77.83% |
| Downside capture | 67.25% | 63.35% |
| Tracking error | 4.60% | 5.84% |
| Information ratio | 0.57 | 0.11 |
| Treynor ratio | 6.02 | 3.72 |
Portfolio
Asset mix
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity | |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 75.28% | 76.26% |
| Unclassified | 12.01% | 0.00% |
| Debt | 8.21% | 20.43% |
| Cash & equivalents | 3.31% | 3.31% |
| REITs / InvITs | 1.57% | 0.00% |
Market-cap split (share of fund assets)
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity | |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 48.26% | 50.84% |
| Mid Cap | 13.88% | 17.95% |
| Small Cap | 11.66% | 6.87% |
| Unclassified | 1.48% | 0.60% |
Concentration
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 32.02% | 39.57% |
| Effective number of stocks ⓘ | 57.7 | 40.8 |
| Securities held | 108 | 70 |
Portfolio overlap: 34%
29 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 34% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a moderate overlap.
| Held by both | Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Bank Limited | 4.16% | 6.41% |
| HDFC Bank Limited | 3.05% | 6.74% |
| Bharti Airtel Limited | 3.05% | 3.69% |
| Reliance Industries Limited | 2.73% | 3.43% |
| State Bank of India | 2.64% | 2.26% |
| Infosys Limited | 1.62% | 2.69% |
| Larsen & Toubro Limited | 1.62% | 2.97% |
| Titan Company Limited | 1.59% | 2.14% |
| Bajaj Finance Limited | 1.27% | 2.09% |
| Mahindra & Mahindra Limited | 1.39% | 1.21% |
| Eternal Limited | 0.90% | 1.39% |
| Solar Industries India Limited | 0.87% | 1.24% |
| Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited | 0.85% | 1.17% |
| TVS Motor Company Ltd. | 0.75% | 0.95% |
| UltraTech Cement Limited | 0.74% | 1.36% |
Top 10 holdings
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid
- EDELWEISS MONEY MARKET FUND - DIRECT PL5.20%
- EDELWEISS ULTRA SHORT TERM FUND5.19%
- ICICI Bank Limited4.16%
- HDFC Bank Limited3.05%
- Bharti Airtel Limited3.05%
- Reliance Industries Limited2.73%
- State Bank of India2.64%
- Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited2.12%
- NTPC Limited1.95%
- 7.65% HDB FIN SERV NCD 10-09-271.93%
PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
- HDFC Bank Limited6.74%
- ICICI Bank Limited6.41%
- 7.26% Government of India (22/08/2032)4.70%
- Axis Bank Limited4.10%
- Bharti Airtel Limited3.69%
- Reliance Industries Limited3.43%
- Larsen & Toubro Limited2.97%
- Infosys Limited2.69%
- 7.1% Government of India (08/04/2034)2.58%
- State Bank of India2.26%
Sector exposure
| Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid | PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity | |
|---|---|---|
| Banks | 12.76% | 15.41% |
| Unclassified | 12.01% | 0.00% |
| Sovereign | 0.00% | 11.77% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 6.05% | 5.39% |
| Auto Components | 5.47% | 4.21% |
| CRISIL AAA | 5.11% | 1.03% |
| IT - Software | 4.52% | 4.60% |
| CRISIL A1+ | 0.00% | 4.60% |
| Finance | 4.56% | 4.13% |
| Consumer Durables | 1.59% | 3.97% |
| Retailing | 3.96% | 2.18% |
| Telecom - Services | 3.55% | 3.69% |
| Petroleum Products | 2.73% | 3.43% |
| Automobiles | 3.42% | 2.16% |
Questions people ask
What is the difference between Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity returns?
As of 5 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +1.12% vs +0.06%; 3-year CAGR +12.18% vs +10.35%; 5-year CAGR +11.47% vs +7.20%; 10-year CAGR +12.27% vs +9.90%. Past returns do not indicate future returns.
How do Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity compare on risk?
Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 11.46% vs 10.98%; Sharpe ratio 0.50 vs 0.35; Sortino ratio 0.71 vs 0.52; maximum drawdown −28.59% vs −31.22%; beta 0.76 vs 0.70.
How much do Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity overlap?
By weight, 34% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 29 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being ICICI Bank Limited, HDFC Bank Limited, Bharti Airtel Limited. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.
What is the large, mid and small cap split of Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity?
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid: large cap 48.3%, mid cap 13.9%, small cap 11.7%. PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity: large cap 50.8%, mid cap 18.0%, small cap 6.9% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).
Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?
No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.
More comparisons
Edelweiss Aggressive Hybrid vs
PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity vs
All Aggressive Hybrid comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →
Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 5 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.