MF Analyser

ITI Value Fund vs Tata Value Fund

ITI Value Fund and Tata Value Fund are both Value / Contra funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +12.02% vs +13.98%, 5-year CAGR +11.40% vs +13.20%, volatility 18.30% vs 15.83%, maximum drawdown −22.72% vs −37.90%. Their portfolios overlap by 14.8% (10 stocks held by both).

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

ITI ValueTata Value
Fund houseITI Mutual FundTata Mutual Fund
Compared asValue / ContraValue / Contra
NAV₹18.1951₹408.0386
NAV date6 Nov 20266 Nov 2026
Launched (first NAV)17 Jun 20212 Jan 2013
Track record5.4 yrs13.8 yrs
Fund size (AUM)₹346 Cr₹8,239 Cr
Securities held7137
Portfolio as of30 Sep 202630 Sep 2026
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

ITI ValueTata Value
1 month+1.02%+5.26%
3 months−4.81%+1.26%
6 months−3.58%+3.59%
1 year−1.02%+2.30%
3 years (CAGR)+12.02%+13.98%
5 years (CAGR)+11.40%+13.20%
7 years (CAGR)—+15.95%
10 years (CAGR)—+14.42%
Since launch (CAGR)+11.76%+16.22%
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ+11.04%+12.59%

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

ITI ValueTata Value
2026 (year to date)−4.22%−0.88%
2025+5.32%+4.74%
2024+20.57%+22.90%
2023+38.94%+38.33%
2022+7.86%+7.04%
2021—+29.39%

Risk

ITI ValueTata Value
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ18.30%15.83%
Downside volatility ⓘ12.59%10.79%
Sharpe ratio ⓘ0.300.47
Sortino ratio ⓘ0.440.69
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−22.72%−37.90%
Recovery from that fall11 months7 months
Current fall from peak−5.55%−4.33%
Rolling 1-year return: worst−13.51%−33.47%
Rolling 1-year return: median+9.15%+13.16%
Rolling 1-year return: best+58.27%+91.65%
Share of 1-year periods with a loss21.94%18.42%

Against each fund's benchmark

ITI ValueTata Value
Beta ⓘ1.130.98
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ+0.31%+1.36%
R² ⓘ91.5593.40
Upside capture113.52%107.29%
Downside capture117.47%104.21%
Tracking error5.74%4.09%
Information ratio0.080.33
Treynor ratio3.675.16

Portfolio

Asset mix

ITI ValueTata Value
Equity95.59%94.57%
Cash & equivalents4.41%5.43%

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

ITI ValueTata Value
Large Cap42.31%65.23%
Mid Cap10.46%20.29%
Small Cap40.59%9.05%
Unclassified2.23%0.00%

Concentration

ITI ValueTata Value
Top 10 holdings25.22%51.14%
Effective number of stocks ⓘ62.426.6
Securities held7137

Portfolio overlap: 14.8%

10 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 14.8% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a low overlap: the two portfolios are largely different.

Held by bothITI ValueTata Value
HDFC Bank Limited4.90%2.53%
ITC Limited2.27%3.44%
Shriram Finance Limited2.16%6.01%
ICICI Bank Limited1.95%9.10%
The Federal Bank Limited1.84%1.91%
Eternal Limited1.45%2.90%
Engineers India Ltd.1.03%1.53%
Infosys Limited0.70%1.42%
Tata Consultancy Services Limited0.44%0.96%
Vedanta Limited0.38%0.96%

Top 10 holdings

ITI Value

  1. HDFC Bank Limited4.90%
  2. Reliance Industries Limited3.31%
  3. ITC Limited2.27%
  4. Manipal Payment and Identity Solutions Ltd2.23%
  5. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited2.21%
  6. Shriram Finance Limited2.16%
  7. Craftsman Automation Limited2.15%
  8. Axis Bank Limited2.13%
  9. ICICI Bank Limited1.95%
  10. Samvardhana Motherson International Limited1.91%

Tata Value

  1. ICICI Bank Limited9.10%
  2. Shriram Finance Limited6.01%
  3. Coal India Limited5.41%
  4. Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd.5.31%
  5. Indus Towers Limited4.48%
  6. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited4.42%
  7. Muthoot Finance Ltd.4.34%
  8. Hindustan Zinc Limited4.33%
  9. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.4.11%
  10. Hero MotoCorp Limited3.63%

Sector exposure

ITI ValueTata Value
Banks22.11%17.96%
Finance12.73%10.35%
Power0.00%7.01%
Healthcare Services6.15%0.00%
Chemicals & Petrochemicals5.82%0.00%
Consumable Fuels0.00%5.41%
Capital Markets0.00%5.31%
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology5.12%0.70%
Auto Components5.05%2.58%
Retailing1.45%4.60%
Telecom - Services0.67%4.48%
Non - Ferrous Metals1.69%4.33%
Petroleum Products3.31%4.11%
Electrical Equipment3.70%0.19%

Questions people ask

What is the difference between ITI Value and Tata Value returns?

As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return −1.02% vs +2.30%; 3-year CAGR +12.02% vs +13.98%; 5-year CAGR +11.40% vs +13.20%; 10-year CAGR — vs +14.42%. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do ITI Value and Tata Value compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 18.30% vs 15.83%; Sharpe ratio 0.30 vs 0.47; Sortino ratio 0.44 vs 0.69; maximum drawdown −22.72% vs −37.90%; beta 1.13 vs 0.98.

How much do ITI Value and Tata Value overlap?

By weight, 14.8% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 10 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being HDFC Bank Limited, ITC Limited, Shriram Finance Limited. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.

What is the large, mid and small cap split of ITI Value and Tata Value?

ITI Value: large cap 42.3%, mid cap 10.5%, small cap 40.6%. Tata Value: large cap 65.2%, mid cap 20.3%, small cap 9.1% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Value / Contra comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.