MF Analyser

JM Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund

JM Aggressive Hybrid Fund and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity Fund are both Aggressive Hybrid funds. As of 4 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +12.55% vs +9.66%, 5-year CAGR +12.59% vs +6.79%, volatility 13.70% vs 10.75%, maximum drawdown −36.57% vs −31.22%. Their portfolios overlap by 23.9% (18 stocks held by both).

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

JM Aggressive HybridPGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
Fund houseJM Financial Mutual FundPGIM India Mutual Fund
Compared asAggressive HybridAggressive Hybrid
NAV₹138.8081₹155.6200
NAV date4 Nov 20264 Nov 2026
Launched (first NAV)3 Jan 20138 Mar 2016
Track record13.8 yrs10.7 yrs
Fund size (AUM)₹654 Cr₹193 Cr
Securities held8170
Portfolio as of30 Sep 202630 Sep 2026
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

JM Aggressive HybridPGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
1 month+2.14%+3.44%
3 months−1.70%−2.32%
6 months+3.21%+0.38%
1 year−1.34%−1.84%
3 years (CAGR)+12.55%+9.66%
5 years (CAGR)+12.59%+6.79%
7 years (CAGR)+18.14%+10.60%
10 years (CAGR)+13.08%+9.65%
Since launch (CAGR)+13.14%+10.48%
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ+11.86%+7.85%

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

JM Aggressive HybridPGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
2026 (year to date)+0.64%−1.28%
2025−1.55%+5.89%
2024+29.28%+16.18%
2023+35.47%+19.15%
2022+9.13%−2.30%
2021+23.91%+24.81%

Risk

JM Aggressive HybridPGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ13.70%10.75%
Downside volatility ⓘ9.19%7.43%
Sharpe ratio ⓘ0.440.30
Sortino ratio ⓘ0.660.43
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−36.57%−31.22%
Recovery from that fall7 months7 months
Current fall from peak−5.68%−3.11%
Rolling 1-year return: worst−34.90%−24.83%
Rolling 1-year return: median+10.07%+9.08%
Rolling 1-year return: best+96.15%+69.42%
Share of 1-year periods with a loss20.26%19.22%

Against each fund's benchmark

JM Aggressive HybridPGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
Beta ⓘ0.820.70
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ+3.42%+0.93%
R² ⓘ73.3488.25
Upside capture100.63%77.83%
Downside capture81.41%63.35%
Tracking error7.79%5.84%
Information ratio0.420.11
Treynor ratio6.463.72

Portfolio

Asset mix

JM Aggressive HybridPGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
Equity77.73%76.26%
Debt19.89%20.43%
Cash & equivalents2.35%3.31%

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

JM Aggressive HybridPGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
Large Cap43.23%50.84%
Mid Cap16.69%17.95%
Small Cap16.65%6.87%
Unclassified1.19%0.60%

Concentration

JM Aggressive HybridPGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
Top 10 holdings25.89%39.57%
Effective number of stocks ⓘ61.940.8
Securities held8170

Portfolio overlap: 23.9%

18 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 23.9% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a low overlap: the two portfolios are largely different.

Held by bothJM Aggressive HybridPGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
Bharti Airtel Limited2.71%3.69%
Reliance Industries Limited2.21%3.43%
Bajaj Finance Limited2.63%2.09%
ICICI Bank Limited2.03%6.41%
HDFC Bank Limited1.68%6.74%
Larsen & Toubro Limited1.43%2.97%
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited1.95%1.41%
Eternal Limited2.94%1.39%
Mahindra & Mahindra Limited1.94%1.21%
Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited2.09%1.17%
One 97 Communications Limited3.80%1.14%
UNO Minda Limited1.08%1.36%
SRF Ltd.1.03%1.12%
Marico Limited0.93%1.03%
GE Vernova T&D India Limited1.09%0.69%

Top 10 holdings

JM Aggressive Hybrid

  1. One 97 Communications Limited3.80%
  2. Eternal Limited2.94%
  3. Bharti Airtel Limited2.71%
  4. 6.94% Government of India (11/05/2036)2.67%
  5. Bajaj Finance Limited2.63%
  6. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited2.42%
  7. 6.36% GOI 16-Feb-20312.29%
  8. Reliance Industries Limited2.21%
  9. Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited2.13%
  10. Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited2.09%

PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity

  1. HDFC Bank Limited6.74%
  2. ICICI Bank Limited6.41%
  3. 7.26% Government of India (22/08/2032)4.70%
  4. Axis Bank Limited4.10%
  5. Bharti Airtel Limited3.69%
  6. Reliance Industries Limited3.43%
  7. Larsen & Toubro Limited2.97%
  8. Infosys Limited2.69%
  9. 7.1% Government of India (08/04/2034)2.58%
  10. State Bank of India2.26%

Sector exposure

JM Aggressive HybridPGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity
Banks12.43%15.41%
Sovereign2.96%11.77%
Finance5.64%4.13%
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology1.95%5.39%
Retailing5.21%2.18%
CRISIL A1+2.83%4.60%
IT - Software2.76%4.60%
Capital Markets4.46%3.09%
CRISIL AAA4.44%1.03%
Auto Components2.93%4.21%
Consumer Durables2.98%3.97%
Automobiles3.90%2.16%
Financial Technology (Fintech)3.80%1.14%
Telecom - Services2.71%3.69%

Questions people ask

What is the difference between JM Aggressive Hybrid and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity returns?

As of 4 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return −1.34% vs −1.84%; 3-year CAGR +12.55% vs +9.66%; 5-year CAGR +12.59% vs +6.79%; 10-year CAGR +13.08% vs +9.65%. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do JM Aggressive Hybrid and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 13.70% vs 10.75%; Sharpe ratio 0.44 vs 0.30; Sortino ratio 0.66 vs 0.43; maximum drawdown −36.57% vs −31.22%; beta 0.82 vs 0.70.

How much do JM Aggressive Hybrid and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity overlap?

By weight, 23.9% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 18 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being Bharti Airtel Limited, Reliance Industries Limited, Bajaj Finance Limited. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.

What is the large, mid and small cap split of JM Aggressive Hybrid and PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity?

JM Aggressive Hybrid: large cap 43.2%, mid cap 16.7%, small cap 16.7%. PGIM India Aggressive Hybrid Equity: large cap 50.8%, mid cap 18.0%, small cap 6.9% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Aggressive Hybrid comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 4 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.