MF Analyser

PGIM India Retirement Fund vs UTI Retirement Fund

PGIM India Retirement Fund and UTI Retirement Fund are both Retirement Funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR — vs +9.26%, 5-year CAGR — vs +8.70%, volatility 16.15% vs 6.88%, maximum drawdown −16.53% vs −18.93%.

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

PGIM India RetirementUTI Retirement
Fund housePGIM India Mutual FundUTI Mutual Fund
Compared asRetirement FundsRetirement Funds
NAV₹12.9300₹55.2638
NAV date6 Nov 20266 Nov 2026
Launched (first NAV)19 Apr 20242 Jan 2013
Track record2.5 yrs13.8 yrs
Fund size (AUM)——
Securities held—122
Portfolio as ofNot disclosed yet30 Sep 2026
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

PGIM India RetirementUTI Retirement
1 month+4.53%+3.01%
3 months0.00%−0.53%
6 months+5.98%+1.99%
1 year+4.78%+1.75%
3 years (CAGR)—+9.26%
5 years (CAGR)—+8.70%
7 years (CAGR)—+11.19%
10 years (CAGR)—+9.19%
Since launch (CAGR)+10.64%+8.35%
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ—+8.28%

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

PGIM India RetirementUTI Retirement
2026 (year to date)+5.90%+0.27%
2025+3.21%+6.70%
2024—+15.22%
2023—+17.44%
2022—+6.03%
2021—+19.32%

Risk

PGIM India RetirementUTI Retirement
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ16.15%6.88%
Downside volatility ⓘ10.77%4.93%
Sharpe ratio ⓘ0.260.40
Sortino ratio ⓘ0.380.56
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−16.53%−18.93%
Recovery from that fall4 months5 months
Current fall from peak−1.00%−0.65%
Rolling 1-year return: worst−5.81%−17.67%
Rolling 1-year return: median+4.51%+8.84%
Rolling 1-year return: best+21.67%+40.78%
Share of 1-year periods with a loss13.80%13.89%

Against each fund's benchmark

PGIM India RetirementUTI Retirement
Beta ⓘ1.000.45
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ+5.14%+0.66%
R² ⓘ86.8993.37
Upside capture114.35%59.35%
Downside capture87.36%39.79%
Tracking error5.77%8.37%
Information ratio0.900.00
Treynor ratio0.044.38

Portfolio

PGIM India Retirement Fund has no usable portfolio disclosure on file yet, so portfolio comparisons are shown only where available.

Asset mix

PGIM India RetirementUTI Retirement
Debt—47.01%
Equity—36.68%
Cash & equivalents—14.41%
REITs / InvITs—1.25%
ETF Units—0.59%

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

PGIM India RetirementUTI Retirement
Large Cap—24.33%
Mid Cap—6.06%
Small Cap—6.17%
Unclassified—0.12%

Concentration

PGIM India RetirementUTI Retirement
Top 10 holdings—28.13%
Effective number of stocks ⓘ—72.4
Securities held—122

Top 10 holdings

PGIM India Retirement

Not disclosed yet.

UTI Retirement

  1. 7.18% Government of India (24/07/2037)6.20%
  2. HDFC Bank Limited3.19%
  3. 7.32% Government of India3.11%
  4. 7.24% Government of India (18/08/2055)3.11%
  5. ICICI Bank Limited2.96%
  6. Reliance Industries Limited2.12%
  7. Export Import Bank of India (12/03/2027)2.12%
  8. Infosys Limited1.96%
  9. MF UNITS UTI - FLOATER FUND1.75%
  10. NCD POWER FINANCE CORPORATION LTD.1.61%

Sector exposure

PGIM India RetirementUTI Retirement
Sovereign—16.20%
CRISIL AAA—8.11%
Banks—8.09%
SOV—7.08%
CRISIL-AAA—4.87%
CRISIL A1+—4.25%
IT - Software—3.13%
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology—2.62%
-—2.34%
Petroleum Products—2.12%
Construction—1.91%
Finance—1.62%
Telecom - Services—1.56%
Power—1.54%

Questions people ask

What is the difference between PGIM India Retirement and UTI Retirement returns?

As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +4.78% vs +1.75%; 3-year CAGR — vs +9.26%; 5-year CAGR — vs +8.70%; 10-year CAGR — vs +9.19%. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do PGIM India Retirement and UTI Retirement compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 16.15% vs 6.88%; Sharpe ratio 0.26 vs 0.40; Sortino ratio 0.38 vs 0.56; maximum drawdown −16.53% vs −18.93%; beta 1.00 vs 0.45.

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Retirement Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.