quant Consumption Fund vs WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities Fund
quant Consumption Fund and WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities Fund are both Consumption Funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR — vs —, 5-year CAGR — vs —, volatility 17.27% vs —, maximum drawdown −30.41% vs −13.66%. Their portfolios overlap by 6.2% (4 stocks held by both).
Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.
Key facts
| quant Consumption | WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | quant Mutual Fund | WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund |
| Compared as | Consumption Funds | Consumption Funds |
| NAV | ₹10.4409 | ₹10.6350 |
| NAV date | 6 Nov 2026 | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Launched (first NAV) | 25 Jan 2024 | 11 Feb 2026 |
| Track record | 2.8 yrs | 0.7 yrs |
| Fund size (AUM) | ₹180 Cr | ₹135 Cr |
| Securities held | 24 | 50 |
| Portfolio as of | 30 Sep 2026 | 30 Sep 2026 |
| Fund page | Full record → | Full record → |
Returns
| quant Consumption | WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +1.12% | +5.96% |
| 3 months | −0.48% | −0.05% |
| 6 months | +4.78% | +7.84% |
| 1 year | +4.24% | — |
| 3 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| 5 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| 7 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| 10 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| Since launch (CAGR) | +1.57% | — |
| SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ | — | — |
Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.
Calendar-year returns
| quant Consumption | WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (year to date) | +5.57% | — |
| 2025 | −7.18% | — |
Risk
| quant Consumption | WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (annualised) ⓘ | 17.27% | — |
| Downside volatility ⓘ | 11.98% | — |
| Sharpe ratio ⓘ | -0.29 | — |
| Sortino ratio ⓘ | -0.41 | — |
| Maximum drawdown ⓘ | −30.41% | −13.66% |
| Recovery from that fall | — | 3 months |
| Current fall from peak | −14.17% | −0.22% |
| Rolling 1-year return: worst | −17.88% | — |
| Rolling 1-year return: median | −6.38% | — |
| Rolling 1-year return: best | +7.80% | — |
| Share of 1-year periods with a loss | 76.36% | — |
Against each fund's benchmark
| quant Consumption | WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| Beta ⓘ | 0.96 | — |
| Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ | −4.85% | — |
| R² ⓘ | 71.89 | — |
| Upside capture | 78.62% | — |
| Downside capture | 100.43% | — |
| Tracking error | 9.17% | — |
| Information ratio | -0.57 | — |
| Treynor ratio | -7.32 | — |
Portfolio
Asset mix
| quant Consumption | WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 82.30% | 90.00% |
| Derivatives | 9.46% | 0.00% |
| Debt | 6.91% | 2.59% |
| Cash & equivalents | -5.13% | 4.49% |
| REITs / InvITs | 0.00% | 2.92% |
Market-cap split (share of fund assets)
| quant Consumption | WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 18.42% | 46.03% |
| Mid Cap | 40.90% | 12.88% |
| Small Cap | 22.99% | 29.78% |
| Unclassified | 0.00% | 1.31% |
Concentration
| quant Consumption | WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 85.70% | 49.16% |
| Effective number of stocks ⓘ | 12.1 | 28.5 |
| Securities held | 24 | 50 |
Portfolio overlap: 6.2%
4 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 6.2% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a low overlap: the two portfolios are largely different.
| Held by both | quant Consumption | WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities |
|---|---|---|
| Bharti Airtel Limited | 4.57% | 7.76% |
| Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd. | 2.17% | 0.79% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 05-Nov-2026 | 0.83% | 0.59% |
| 91 Days Treasury Bill 22-Oct-2026 | 1.11% | 0.22% |
Top 10 holdings
quant Consumption
- TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 1010.80%
- ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited10.44%
- LG Electronics India Ltd9.33%
- Capri Global Capital Limited9.03%
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited8.94%
- Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited8.77%
- Reliance Industries Limited8.62%
- Ventive Hospitality Limited8.03%
- Zydus Lifesciences Limited7.16%
- Bharti Airtel Limited4.57%
WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities
- Bharti Airtel Limited7.76%
- Nestle India Limited7.60%
- Eternal Limited7.52%
- Mahindra & Mahindra Limited6.40%
- Titan Company Limited4.89%
- TIMEX GROUP INDIA LIMITED3.52%
- Maruti Suzuki India Limited3.36%
- Nexus Select Trust - REIT2.92%
- Marico Limited2.84%
- Indigo Paints Limited2.35%
Sector exposure
| quant Consumption | WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities | |
|---|---|---|
| Capital Markets | 19.21% | 0.00% |
| Retailing | 0.00% | 18.94% |
| N.A. | 18.84% | 0.00% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 16.94% | 3.25% |
| Consumer Durables | 9.33% | 15.89% |
| Personal Products | 10.77% | 4.25% |
| Food Products | 1.86% | 10.35% |
| Automobiles | 0.00% | 9.81% |
| Finance | 9.03% | 0.00% |
| Petroleum Products | 8.62% | 0.00% |
| Telecom - Services | 4.57% | 7.76% |
| SOV | 5.79% | 0.59% |
| Agricultural Food & other Products | 0.00% | 4.58% |
| Leisure Services | 0.00% | 3.75% |
Questions people ask
What is the difference between quant Consumption and WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities returns?
As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +4.24% vs —; 3-year CAGR — vs —; 5-year CAGR — vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.
How do quant Consumption and WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities compare on risk?
Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 17.27% vs —; Sharpe ratio -0.29 vs —; Sortino ratio -0.41 vs —; maximum drawdown −30.41% vs −13.66%; beta 0.96 vs —.
How much do quant Consumption and WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities overlap?
By weight, 6.2% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 4 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being Bharti Airtel Limited, Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Ltd., 91 Days Treasury Bill 05-Nov-2026. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.
What is the large, mid and small cap split of quant Consumption and WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities?
quant Consumption: large cap 18.4%, mid cap 40.9%, small cap 23.0%. WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities: large cap 46.0%, mid cap 12.9%, small cap 29.8% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).
Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?
No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.
More comparisons
quant Consumption vs
- quant Consumption vs Union Consumption
- quant Consumption vs Edelweiss Consumption
- quant Consumption vs Kotak Consumption
- quant Consumption vs Sundaram Consumption Fund (Formerly Known as Sundaram Rural and Consumption Fund)
- quant Consumption vs Baroda BNP Paribas India Consumption
- quant Consumption vs Invesco India Consumption
WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities vs
- WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities vs Canara Robeco Consumption
- WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities vs ITI Bharat Consumption
- WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities vs SBI CONSUMPTION OPPORTUNITIES
- WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities vs Bajaj Finserv Consumption
- WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities vs ICICI Prudential FMCG
- WhiteOak Capital Consumption Opportunities vs Motilal Oswal Consumption
All Consumption Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →
Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.