MF Analyser

quant Quantamental Fund

All plans and options of quant Quantamental Fund
Scheme (as filed with AMFI)PlanOptionNAVAMFI code
quant Quantamental Fund — Direct Plan — Growth OptionDirectGrowth Option ₹27.0641 9 Nov 2026 148925
quant Quantamental Fund — Direct Plan — IDCW OptionDirectIDCW ₹27.2125 9 Nov 2026 148924
quant Quantamental Fund — Regular Plan — Growth OptionRegularGrowth Option ₹24.9012 9 Nov 2026 148923
quant Quantamental Fund — Regular Plan — IDCW OptionRegularIDCW ₹24.9301 9 Nov 2026 148922

Fund basics

Launched3 May 2021 5.5 years of history
CategorySectoral / ThematicSEBI classification
Plan & optionDirect · Growth Option code 148925
BenchmarkNIFTY 500 TRI used for alpha & beta below
NAV as on9 Nov 2026source AMFI

Computed from 1,363 published NAVs between 3 May 2021 and 9 Nov 2026 — 5.5 years of history. Nothing here is an estimate; it is arithmetic on what the fund actually printed.

How it has moved

Return over time (%)

Fund name 1M3M6M1Y3Y5Y7Y10YSince launch
quant Quantamental Fund Direct 5.98-1.142.38 9.3515.4617.89 ——19.72
NIFTY 500 TRI benchmark -6.32-5.775.05 -3.809.148.89 14.2512.6614.26
Sectoral / Thematic category median · 143 funds ——— 3.4714.9811.74 —15.10—

Anything over a year is annualised (CAGR); shorter windows are absolute. The benchmark row is the index's own Total Return Index, as published by NSE, measured to 9 Nov 2026. The category row is the median Direct plan in Sectoral / Thematic — the middle fund, not a ranking, and a median rather than an average so that one mis-stated scheme cannot move it. As on 9 Nov 2026.

Risk measures

Fund name Volatility Sharpe Sortino Beta Alpha Max fall
quant Quantamental Fund Direct 18.38 0.49 0.78 1.08 3.92 -23.34
NIFTY 500 TRI benchmark 15.66 0.17 0.25 —— -38.11

Risk-free rate 6.5%. The benchmark row is the index's NSE Total Return Index. Beta and alpha need the index as a reference, so the benchmark's own row leaves them blank.

Against its benchmark

Regressed on the 36 months this fund and NIFTY 500 TRI both have, using NSE's own Total Return Index for it. Alpha is Jensen's — the return left over after the market move this fund's own beta would predict.

AlphaBetaR²Fund vs indexUp captureDown captureTracking errorInformation ratioTreynor
3.92%1.0882%4.23%115%98%8.04%0.537.31

Up and down capture are the pair worth reading together: a fund that takes 95% of the rises but only 80% of the falls is doing something a headline CAGR will never show you.

Risk

VolatilityDownside volatilitySharpeSortino
18.4%11.5%0.490.78

Risk-free rate 6.5%, roughly the 10-year government bond.

The worst it has been

Deepest fallTime to recoverToday, from its peak
-23.3%15 months-2.7%
0%-8%-16%-24%202220242026
How far below its own record high the fund sat, on every single day it has existed. Flat along the top means it was making new highs; every dip is a stretch where somebody who bought at the wrong moment was down.

A drawdown is the fall from a previous high to the low that followed it. It is the number that decides whether somebody stays invested — a fund can have an excellent ten-year return and still have been unbearable to hold in year four.

Every one-year period it has lived through

Best yearMedian yearWorst yearLosing years
74.2%16.7%-13.1%16%
Worst-13.1%Median16.7%Best74.2%now
The full spread of one-year outcomes, with the fund's actual last twelve months marked. It answers the question a single number cannot: is right now an ordinary year for this fund, or an unusual one?

Rolling returns ask a fairer question than a single five-year figure: not "what did it do from this one start date", but "what happened across every start date". A fund whose worst year is −45% is a different proposition from one whose worst is −8%, even if the averages match.

Calendar years

29.0%202239.5%202315.5%20247.9%20257.0%2026MF Analyser
Each year on its own, January to December. Losing years hang below the line — averages hide them, and the years somebody actually had to sit through are the ones that decide whether they stayed.

If you had run a SIP

₹10,000 every month for five years — ₹600,000 invested in all — would be worth ₹890,926 today, an XIRR of 15.82% a year.

XIRR, not CAGR. A SIP's money arrives over sixty months, so most of it has been invested for far less than five years — which is why this figure normally sits below the five-year CAGR above in a rising market, and above it in a falling one. It is the return the investor got, not the return the fund got.

What it actually holds

The real portfolio the AMC filed with AMFI, as on 30 Sep 2026. Nothing here is estimated — when a fund has no filing in our store the section simply does not appear. A fund is its holdings; the returns above are only what those holdings did.

Asset allocation

70.52%Equity
22.79%Derivatives
7.80%Debt

A fund's risk starts here — how much of it is even in the market — before any question of which stocks or which sectors. Cash is not idleness; it is the manager's choice not to be invested, and it shows up as a drag in a rising market and a cushion in a falling one.

Portfolio aggregates

69.29%Large
22.11%Mid
1.92%Small
Large Cap 69.3%69.3%Mid Cap 22.1%22.1%Small Cap 1.9%Unclassified 29.7%29.7%Large Cap 69.3%Mid Cap 22.1%Small Cap 1.9%Unclassified 29.7%
AMFI's half-yearly ranking: 1–100 Large, 101–250 Mid, 251+ Small. The rest is debt, cash, foreign holdings or fund units, which AMFI does not rank.

Concentration

Number of stocks29
Top 5 stocks57.46%
Top 10 stocks88.49%
Top 20 stocks116.06%
Largest single holding21.90%
Largest sectorN.A. · 115.22%
Number of sectors2
Effective stocks9.2
Cash & equivalents-23.02%

Counting positions overstates diversification. The effective-stocks figure is the honest count: a portfolio can hold seventy names and still have most of its money in twenty.

Sector allocation

N.A. — 92.2%SOV — 7.8%N.A.92.2%SOV7.8%
Where the equity money sits, by industry.

Largest holdings

Top 10 are 88.5% of the fund. A high number means a concentrated portfolio — fewer names doing more of the work, for better and for worse.

TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 10 21.90%
Adani Enterprises Limited 9.07%
Adani Green Energy Limited 9.04%
Piramal Finance Ltd 8.87%
Reliance Industries Ltd. 8.58%
Aurobindo Pharma Limited 7.27%
Bharti Airtel Ltd. 7.06%
Life Insurance Corporation Of India 6.61%
Indus Towers Limited 5.49%
ICICI Prudential AMC Ltd 4.58%
Zydus Lifesciences Limited 4.52%
Adani Power Limited 4.23%

Disclosed holdings from the AMC's AMFI filing, largest first. A portfolio is filed monthly and shifts between filings — this is the most recent one loaded, not a live book.

What the manager did last month

Between the filing of 31 Aug 2026 and 30 Sep 2026. A position grows for two reasons — the manager bought more, or the price went up — and only the first is a decision. The share count is what separates them, because it moves only when somebody trades.

Bought₹0.0 cr shares added, valued at this filing
Sold₹15.6 cr shares reduced or exited
New positions0 stocks not held a month ago
Sold out of2 stocks fully exited
Price move of what it held -2.03% the market's doing, not the manager's

Cash and equivalents: ₹339 cr (was ₹242 cr at the previous filing)

Swipe the table sideways for share counts, price change and values.

Stock Shares traded Change in shares Change in price Value of the trade₹ crore Position now₹ crore
New positiondid not hold this a month ago 1
TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 10 338,806 entered — 339 339
Trimmedcut the share count, without selling out 1
Piramal Finance Ltd 76,067 -10.2% -11.2% 15.6 137
Sold out ofheld last month, gone this month 3
DLF Limited 1,340,188 exited — 92.6 —
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited 1,286,656 exited — 54.0 —
TREPS 01-Sep-2026 DEPO 10 241,872 exited — 242 —

Only stocks and fund units are listed. Treasury bills, repo and money-market lines roll over every month by design — they are larger in rupees than most equity trades and are not decisions, so they are summarised as cash above rather than listed as activity. Share counts and values are the fund house's own filing. What a position cost when it was first bought is in no monthly disclosure, so a value here is what the shares were worth at the later filing, not what was paid.

One caveat on the share count: a corporate action — a stock split, a bonus issue, a merger, or an ISIN change — also moves the number of shares without the manager trading, and a monthly disclosure does not flag it. A sudden clean multiple (a doubling, a halving) is more likely a split than a decision. Treat a single large, round jump as something to check against the stock's own corporate-action history rather than as the manager buying or selling.

How it compares in its category

Against the Sectoral / Thematic Direct schemes with the highest three-year return. Same category, same plan — the only comparison that means anything. The list re-sorts itself as returns move; it is an ordering by one number, not a view on which fund anyone should hold.

Return window
Scheme Return Alpha Beta Volatility Sharpe Max fall
quant Quantamental Fund quant Mutual Fund · this scheme 15.5% 3.9% 1.08 18.4% 0.49 -23.3%
Nippon India Taiwan Equity Fund Nippon India Mutual Fund 43.1% 43.9% 0.42 38.5% 0.95 -44.8%
HDFC Defence Fund HDFC Mutual Fund 34.1% 21.1% 1.59 30.9% 0.89 -34.5%
HDFC Pharma and Healthcare Fund HDFC Mutual Fund 31.4% 18.5% 0.72 15.7% 1.59 -14.9%
SBI HEALTHCARE OPPORTUNITIES FUND SBI Mutual Fund 25.5% 14.0% 0.64 14.0% 1.36 -30.5%
HDFC Transportation and Logistics Fund HDFC Mutual Fund 24.8% 12.1% 1.06 18.8% 0.97 -23.5%
Mirae Asset Healthcare Fund Mirae Asset Mutual Fund 24.6% 13.4% 0.69 15.4% 1.18 -20.0%
UTI - Healthcare Fund UTI Mutual Fund 24.1% 12.8% 0.76 15.3% 1.15 -27.1%
ICICI PRUDENTIAL TRANSPORTATION AND LOGISTICS FUND ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund 22.7% 9.2% 1.06 18.5% 0.88 -23.6%

Alpha and beta are against NIFTY 500 TRI. Max fall is the deepest peak-to-trough drop in each fund's own history, so a longer-running fund has had more chances to record a bad one. Click a column to sort. This is a sort, not a ranking, and nothing here is a recommendation.

What a Sectoral / Thematic scheme is

At least 80% in one sector or theme.

The same concentration risk as any sector fund. Themes are usually launched after the theme has already run, which is why the average investor's return in these funds trails the funds' own published returns.

Who it suits. A small, deliberate satellite position — rarely a core holding.

How long money should stay. Through a full cycle.

Compare this scheme with others →

Questions people ask

What is the NAV of quant Quantamental Fund — Direct Plan — Growth Option?

₹27.0641 as on 9 Nov 2026, from AMFI's daily NAV file. NAV is declared once each business day after markets close, so the figure here is the most recent one published.

What is the difference between the Direct and Regular plan of quant Quantamental Fund?

They hold the identical portfolio, run by the same manager. A Regular plan pays a distributor commission out of the fund, inside its expense ratio — commonly 0.5% to 1.2% a year more than Direct. That difference is charged on the whole balance every year, so it compounds. As an illustration, not a forecast: ₹1,00,000 invested for ten years at 12% a year ends at about ₹3.11 lakh, but at 10.5% — a 1.5 percentage-point gap and nothing else changed — it ends at about ₹2.71 lakh, roughly ₹40,000 less. The longer you hold, the wider the gap. Direct is the same fund without the commission.

What does the Growth option mean?

Growth reinvests everything the fund earns back into the NAV. Nothing is paid out, so the NAV rises with returns and you are taxed only when you sell. For anybody who does not need income from the investment, Growth is the simpler and usually the more tax-efficient option.

What kind of scheme is this?

At least 80% in one sector or theme. The same concentration risk as any sector fund. Themes are usually launched after the theme has already run, which is why the average investor's return in these funds trails the funds' own published returns.

How long should money stay in it?

Typically Through a full cycle. A small, deliberate satellite position — rarely a core holding.