MF Analyser

DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt Fund vs Edelweiss Financial Services Fund

DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt Fund and Edelweiss Financial Services Fund are both Banking & Financial Services Funds. As of 5 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR — vs —, 5-year CAGR — vs —, volatility — vs —, maximum drawdown −0.15% vs −15.82%. Their portfolios overlap by 0% (0 stocks held by both).

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

DSP Financial Services Sectoral DebtEdelweiss Financial Services
Fund houseDSP Mutual FundEdelweiss Mutual Fund
Compared asBanking & Financial Services FundsBanking & Financial Services Funds
NAV₹10.0874₹9.4946
NAV date5 Nov 20265 Nov 2026
Launched (first NAV)28 Aug 202618 Feb 2026
Track record0.2 yrs0.7 yrs
Fund size (AUM)₹685 Cr₹274 Cr
Securities held2134
Portfolio as of30 Sep 202630 Sep 2026
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

DSP Financial Services Sectoral DebtEdelweiss Financial Services
1 month+0.31%+4.40%
3 months—−2.44%
6 months—−1.54%
1 year——
3 years (CAGR)——
5 years (CAGR)——
7 years (CAGR)——
10 years (CAGR)——
Since launch (CAGR)——
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ——

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Risk

DSP Financial Services Sectoral DebtEdelweiss Financial Services
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ——
Downside volatility ⓘ——
Sharpe ratio ⓘ——
Sortino ratio ⓘ——
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−0.15%−15.82%
Recovery from that fall0 months—
Current fall from peak0.00%−5.74%
Rolling 1-year return: worst——
Rolling 1-year return: median——
Rolling 1-year return: best——
Share of 1-year periods with a loss——

Against each fund's benchmark

DSP Financial Services Sectoral DebtEdelweiss Financial Services
Beta ⓘ——
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ——
R² ⓘ——
Upside capture——
Downside capture——
Tracking error——
Information ratio——
Treynor ratio——

Portfolio

Asset mix

DSP Financial Services Sectoral DebtEdelweiss Financial Services
Debt98.73%0.00%
Cash & equivalents1.27%3.27%
Equity0.00%96.73%

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

DSP Financial Services Sectoral DebtEdelweiss Financial Services
Large Cap0.00%68.87%
Mid Cap0.00%11.44%
Small Cap0.00%16.20%
Unclassified0.00%0.22%

Concentration

DSP Financial Services Sectoral DebtEdelweiss Financial Services
Top 10 holdings66.18%64.13%
Effective number of stocks ⓘ17.518.1
Securities held2134

Portfolio overlap: 0%

0 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 0% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a low overlap: the two portfolios are largely different.

Top 10 holdings

DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt

  1. 7.35% Bharti Telecom Limited (15/10/2027)8.53%
  2. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.7.65%
  3. 8.05% State Government Securities7.50%
  4. 7.6% Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited (19/05/2028)7.44%
  5. 7.18% Sundaram Finance Limited (16/05/2028)7.40%
  6. 7.3763% Bajaj Finance Limited (26/06/2028)7.35%
  7. 7.65% HDB FIN SERV NCD 10-09-277.31%
  8. Piramal Finance Ltd.4.51%
  9. 7.90% Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (30/08/2027)4.41%
  10. Infina Finance Pvt Limited4.08%

Edelweiss Financial Services

  1. HDFC Bank Limited11.55%
  2. ICICI Bank Limited10.86%
  3. State Bank of India8.33%
  4. Axis Bank Limited7.51%
  5. Shriram Finance Limited5.64%
  6. BSE Limited5.29%
  7. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited5.21%
  8. Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited3.33%
  9. SBI Life Insurance Company Limited3.22%
  10. City Union Bank Limited3.19%

Sector exposure

DSP Financial Services Sectoral DebtEdelweiss Financial Services
CRISIL AAA68.45%0.00%
Banks0.00%57.14%
Finance0.00%21.21%
Capital Markets0.00%12.76%
Sovereign9.00%0.00%
Insurance0.00%4.95%
CRISIL AA+4.61%0.00%
CARE AA+4.51%0.00%
CARE AAA4.41%0.00%
CRISIL A1+4.08%0.00%
ICRA AA+3.67%0.00%
Financial Technology (Fintech)0.00%0.67%

Questions people ask

What is the difference between DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt and Edelweiss Financial Services returns?

As of 5 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return — vs —; 3-year CAGR — vs —; 5-year CAGR — vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt and Edelweiss Financial Services compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) — vs —; Sharpe ratio — vs —; Sortino ratio — vs —; maximum drawdown −0.15% vs −15.82%; beta — vs —.

How much do DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt and Edelweiss Financial Services overlap?

By weight, 0% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 0 stocks are held by both. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.

What is the large, mid and small cap split of DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt and Edelweiss Financial Services?

DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt: large cap 0.0%, mid cap 0.0%, small cap 0.0%. Edelweiss Financial Services: large cap 68.9%, mid cap 11.4%, small cap 16.2% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Banking & Financial Services Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 5 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.