MF Analyser

Groww Banking & Financial Services Fund vs UTI Financial Services Debt Fund

Groww Banking & Financial Services Fund and UTI Financial Services Debt Fund are both Banking & Financial Services Funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR — vs —, 5-year CAGR — vs —, volatility 17.73% vs —, maximum drawdown −16.35% vs —.

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

Groww Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Fund houseGroww Mutual FundUTI Mutual Fund
Compared asBanking & Financial Services FundsBanking & Financial Services Funds
NAV₹13.1742—
NAV date6 Nov 2026—
Launched (first NAV)7 Feb 2024—
Track record2.7 yrs—
Fund size (AUM)₹107 Cr—
Securities held42—
Portfolio as of30 Sep 2026Not disclosed yet
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

Groww Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
1 month−0.32%—
3 months−2.15%—
6 months+1.92%—
1 year+7.60%—
3 years (CAGR)——
5 years (CAGR)——
7 years (CAGR)——
10 years (CAGR)——
Since launch (CAGR)+10.73%—
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ——

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

Groww Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
2026 (year to date)+6.13%—
2025+11.03%—

Risk

Groww Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ17.73%—
Downside volatility ⓘ11.77%—
Sharpe ratio ⓘ0.24—
Sortino ratio ⓘ0.36—
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−16.35%—
Recovery from that fall3 months—
Current fall from peak−5.74%—
Rolling 1-year return: worst−3.05%—
Rolling 1-year return: median+10.41%—
Rolling 1-year return: best+27.81%—
Share of 1-year periods with a loss3.94%—

Against each fund's benchmark

Groww Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Beta ⓘ1.00—
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ+3.77%—
R² ⓘ77.88—
Upside capture115.72%—
Downside capture98.42%—
Tracking error8.20%—
Information ratio0.45—
Treynor ratio1.38—

Portfolio

UTI Financial Services Debt Fund has no usable portfolio disclosure on file yet, so portfolio comparisons are shown only where available.

Asset mix

Groww Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Equity95.18%—
Cash & equivalents4.81%—

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

Groww Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Large Cap20.22%—
Mid Cap25.39%—
Small Cap42.32%—
Unclassified7.25%—

Concentration

Groww Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Top 10 holdings39.30%—
Effective number of stocks ⓘ34.9—
Securities held42—

Top 10 holdings

Groww Banking & Financial Services

  1. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited4.63%
  2. Axis Bank Limited4.46%
  3. TREPS 01-OCT-20264.34%
  4. Multi Commodity Exchange of India Limited4.21%
  5. Cartrade Tech Limited4.18%
  6. Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Limited4.00%
  7. Manipal Payment and Identity Solutions Ltd3.78%
  8. Onemi Technology Solutions Limited3.62%
  9. One 97 Communications Limited3.10%
  10. Shriram Finance Limited2.99%

UTI Financial Services Debt

Not disclosed yet.

Sector exposure

Groww Banking & Financial ServicesUTI Financial Services Debt
Banks28.71%—
Finance27.24%—
Capital Markets19.97%—
Financial Technology (Fintech)11.28%—
Retailing4.54%—
Unclassified4.34%—
Insurance3.45%—

Questions people ask

What is the difference between Groww Banking & Financial Services and UTI Financial Services Debt returns?

As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +7.60% vs —; 3-year CAGR — vs —; 5-year CAGR — vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do Groww Banking & Financial Services and UTI Financial Services Debt compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 17.73% vs —; Sharpe ratio 0.24 vs —; Sortino ratio 0.36 vs —; maximum drawdown −16.35% vs —; beta 1.00 vs —.

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Banking & Financial Services Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.