MF Analyser

Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid Fund vs UTI Conservative Hybrid Fund

Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid Fund and UTI Conservative Hybrid Fund are both Conservative Hybrid funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +9.10% vs +7.98%, 5-year CAGR +9.13% vs +7.06%, volatility 3.63% vs 4.96%, maximum drawdown −2.74% vs −14.44%. Their portfolios overlap by 5.7% (7 stocks held by both).

Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.

Key facts

Parag Parikh Conservative HybridUTI Conservative Hybrid
Fund housePPFAS Mutual FundUTI Mutual Fund
Compared asConservative HybridConservative Hybrid
NAV₹16.1115₹77.3791
NAV date6 Nov 20266 Nov 2026
Launched (first NAV)28 May 20212 Jan 2013
Track record5.4 yrs13.8 yrs
Fund size (AUM)₹3,454 Cr—
Securities held78107
Portfolio as of30 Sep 202630 Sep 2026
Fund pageFull record →Full record →

Returns

Parag Parikh Conservative HybridUTI Conservative Hybrid
1 month+0.66%+1.82%
3 months−0.58%−0.44%
6 months+1.79%+2.02%
1 year+3.58%+1.58%
3 years (CAGR)+9.10%+7.98%
5 years (CAGR)+9.13%+7.06%
7 years (CAGR)—+8.82%
10 years (CAGR)—+8.04%
Since launch (CAGR)+9.15%+9.10%
SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ+8.46%+6.99%

Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.

Calendar-year returns

Parag Parikh Conservative HybridUTI Conservative Hybrid
2026 (year to date)+3.27%+0.98%
2025+7.75%+6.72%
2024+12.83%+12.32%
2023+14.03%+11.96%
2022+7.87%+3.91%
2021—+13.83%

Risk

Parag Parikh Conservative HybridUTI Conservative Hybrid
Volatility (annualised) ⓘ3.63%4.96%
Downside volatility ⓘ2.40%3.60%
Sharpe ratio ⓘ0.720.30
Sortino ratio ⓘ1.080.41
Maximum drawdown ⓘ−2.74%−14.44%
Recovery from that fall—5 months
Current fall from peak−0.67%−0.60%
Rolling 1-year return: worst+1.42%−12.28%
Rolling 1-year return: median+8.89%+9.47%
Rolling 1-year return: best+19.78%+29.58%
Share of 1-year periods with a loss0.00%3.78%

Against each fund's benchmark

Parag Parikh Conservative HybridUTI Conservative Hybrid
Beta ⓘ——
Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ——
R² ⓘ——
Upside capture——
Downside capture——
Tracking error——
Information ratio——
Treynor ratio——

Portfolio

Asset mix

Parag Parikh Conservative HybridUTI Conservative Hybrid
Debt73.96%66.38%
REITs / InvITs12.41%0.00%
Equity10.11%24.14%
Cash & equivalents2.51%9.22%
Mutual Fund Units1.01%0.00%
ETF Units0.00%0.24%

Market-cap split (share of fund assets)

Parag Parikh Conservative HybridUTI Conservative Hybrid
Large Cap7.10%15.93%
Mid Cap2.09%4.37%
Small Cap0.64%3.59%
Unclassified0.28%0.25%

Concentration

Parag Parikh Conservative HybridUTI Conservative Hybrid
Top 10 holdings38.08%34.78%
Effective number of stocks ⓘ41.549.9
Securities held78107

Portfolio overlap: 5.7%

7 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 5.7% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a low overlap: the two portfolios are largely different.

Held by bothParag Parikh Conservative HybridUTI Conservative Hybrid
7.49% Small Industries Dev Bank of India2.15%1.55%
7.3763% Bajaj Finance Limited (26/06/2028)1.43%1.54%
7.40 % National Bank For Agriculture and Rural Development (29/04/2030)1.42%4.61%
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited1.97%0.46%
Coal India Limited2.07%0.33%
Corporate Debt Market Development Fund Class A20.28%0.32%
ITC Limited2.02%0.25%

Top 10 holdings

Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid

  1. 7.21% Tamilnadu SDL (MD 21/01/2032)5.55%
  2. Brookfield India Real Estate Trust5.06%
  3. Embassy Office Parks REIT5.01%
  4. 7.08% Uttar Pradesh SDL (MD 17/02/2031)4.27%
  5. 7.08% Karnataka SDL (MD 12/08/2031)3.99%
  6. 7.72% Maharashtra SDL (MD 01/03/2031)3.66%
  7. 7.72% Maharashtra SDL (MD 23/03/2032)2.91%
  8. 7.38% Karnataka SDL (MD 04/09/2034)2.69%
  9. 7.73% Maharashtra SDL (MD 29/03/2032)2.48%
  10. 8.15% Tata Capital Limited2.46%

UTI Conservative Hybrid

  1. Government Securities7.01%
  2. 7.40 % National Bank For Agriculture and Rural Development (29/04/2030)4.61%
  3. 7.24% Government of India (18/08/2055)3.87%
  4. 7.58% REC Limited3.10%
  5. 7.645% LIC Housing Finance Limited 21-FEB-20303.08%
  6. NCD JIO CREDIT LTD3.06%
  7. Siddhivinayak Securitisation Trust2.98%
  8. 7.34% GOI MAT 2204642.97%
  9. 6.94% Government of India (11/05/2036)2.15%
  10. HDFC Bank Limited1.95%

Sector exposure

Parag Parikh Conservative HybridUTI Conservative Hybrid
Sovereign42.99%17.26%
CRISIL AAA19.40%29.78%
Realty12.41%1.13%
SOVEREIGN8.96%1.46%
Banks0.00%6.82%
CRISIL AAA(SO)0.00%4.47%
CRISIL AA+0.00%3.12%
ICRA AAA2.15%3.10%
ICRA AA+0.00%2.67%
SOV0.46%2.66%
Gas2.09%0.21%
Consumable Fuels2.07%0.33%
Diversified FMCG2.02%0.25%
IT - Software0.00%2.02%

Questions people ask

What is the difference between Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid and UTI Conservative Hybrid returns?

As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return +3.58% vs +1.58%; 3-year CAGR +9.10% vs +7.98%; 5-year CAGR +9.13% vs +7.06%; 10-year CAGR — vs +8.04%. Past returns do not indicate future returns.

How do Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid and UTI Conservative Hybrid compare on risk?

Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 3.63% vs 4.96%; Sharpe ratio 0.72 vs 0.30; Sortino ratio 1.08 vs 0.41; maximum drawdown −2.74% vs −14.44%; beta — vs —.

How much do Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid and UTI Conservative Hybrid overlap?

By weight, 5.7% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 7 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being 7.49% Small Industries Dev Bank of India, 7.3763% Bajaj Finance Limited (26/06/2028), 7.40 % National Bank For Agriculture and Rural Development (29/04/2030). Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.

What is the large, mid and small cap split of Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid and UTI Conservative Hybrid?

Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid: large cap 7.1%, mid cap 2.1%, small cap 0.6%. UTI Conservative Hybrid: large cap 15.9%, mid cap 4.4%, small cap 3.6% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).

Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?

No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.

More comparisons

All Conservative Hybrid comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →

Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.