quant Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund vs UTI Balanced Advantage Fund
quant Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund and UTI Balanced Advantage Fund are both Balanced Advantage funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR +13.47% vs +10.14%, 5-year CAGR — vs —, volatility 15.94% vs 9.21%, maximum drawdown −18.43% vs −10.47%. Their portfolios overlap by 7.3% (5 stocks held by both).
Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.
Key facts
| quant Dynamic Asset Allocation | UTI Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | quant Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
| Compared as | Balanced Advantage | Balanced Advantage |
| NAV | ₹17.1857 | ₹13.5436 |
| NAV date | 6 Nov 2026 | 6 Nov 2026 |
| Launched (first NAV) | 13 Apr 2023 | 17 Aug 2023 |
| Track record | 3.6 yrs | 3.2 yrs |
| Fund size (AUM) | ₹810 Cr | — |
| Securities held | 24 | 86 |
| Portfolio as of | 30 Sep 2026 | 30 Sep 2026 |
| Fund page | Full record → | Full record → |
Returns
| quant Dynamic Asset Allocation | UTI Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +1.78% | +6.92% |
| 3 months | −1.06% | +2.14% |
| 6 months | −1.11% | +5.13% |
| 1 year | −0.24% | +2.13% |
| 3 years (CAGR) | +13.47% | +10.14% |
| 5 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| 7 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| 10 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| Since launch (CAGR) | +16.37% | +10.03% |
| SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ | — | — |
Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.
Calendar-year returns
| quant Dynamic Asset Allocation | UTI Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (year to date) | −0.78% | +0.30% |
| 2025 | +5.25% | +10.20% |
| 2024 | +22.05% | +12.52% |
Risk
| quant Dynamic Asset Allocation | UTI Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (annualised) ⓘ | 15.94% | 9.21% |
| Downside volatility ⓘ | 10.00% | 6.56% |
| Sharpe ratio ⓘ | 0.44 | 0.40 |
| Sortino ratio ⓘ | 0.70 | 0.55 |
| Maximum drawdown ⓘ | −18.43% | −10.47% |
| Recovery from that fall | — | — |
| Current fall from peak | −4.57% | −0.22% |
| Rolling 1-year return: worst | −7.17% | −5.53% |
| Rolling 1-year return: median | +3.72% | +8.67% |
| Rolling 1-year return: best | +65.31% | +25.03% |
| Share of 1-year periods with a loss | 25.08% | 15.64% |
Against each fund's benchmark
| quant Dynamic Asset Allocation | UTI Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| Beta ⓘ | 0.95 | 0.59 |
| Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ | +4.38% | +0.52% |
| R² ⓘ | 73.78 | 95.24 |
| Upside capture | 108.41% | 67.28% |
| Downside capture | 85.18% | 51.05% |
| Tracking error | 8.39% | 6.42% |
| Information ratio | 0.53 | 0.01 |
| Treynor ratio | 6.75 | 3.48 |
Portfolio
Asset mix
| quant Dynamic Asset Allocation | UTI Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 59.48% | 68.71% |
| Cash & equivalents | 13.10% | 4.82% |
| REITs / InvITs | 8.70% | 1.47% |
| Debt | 7.78% | 24.98% |
| Mutual Fund Units | 3.60% | 0.00% |
Market-cap split (share of fund assets)
| quant Dynamic Asset Allocation | UTI Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 40.14% | 57.31% |
| Mid Cap | 13.07% | 7.25% |
| Small Cap | 6.28% | 3.14% |
| Unclassified | 0.00% | 1.01% |
Concentration
| quant Dynamic Asset Allocation | UTI Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 89.14% | 39.07% |
| Effective number of stocks ⓘ | 9.8 | 42.7 |
| Securities held | 24 | 86 |
Portfolio overlap: 7.3%
5 companies are held by both funds; by weight, 7.3% of the two portfolios is the same. That is a low overlap: the two portfolios are largely different.
| Held by both | quant Dynamic Asset Allocation | UTI Balanced Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Bharti Airtel Limited | 9.59% | 3.50% |
| Reliance Industries Limited | 1.94% | 4.29% |
| Aurobindo Pharma Limited | 10.25% | 0.71% |
| Bagmane Prime Office REIT | 8.70% | 0.70% |
| Adani Enterprises Limited | 9.45% | 0.47% |
Top 10 holdings
quant Dynamic Asset Allocation
- TREPS 01-Oct-2026 DEPO 1020.54%
- Aurobindo Pharma Limited10.25%
- Bharti Airtel Limited9.59%
- Adani Green Energy Limited9.50%
- Adani Enterprises Limited9.45%
- Indus Towers Limited9.21%
- Bagmane Prime Office REIT8.70%
- Ventive Hospitality Limited5.47%
- Quant Arbitrage Fund -Direct Plan Growth3.60%
- GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Limited2.82%
UTI Balanced Advantage
- HDFC Bank Limited6.71%
- ICICI Bank Limited6.61%
- Reliance Industries Limited4.29%
- Government of India (10/04/2028)3.71%
- Bharti Airtel Limited3.50%
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited3.37%
- Axis Bank Limited2.91%
- Infosys Limited2.73%
- State Bank of India2.73%
- Eternal Limited2.51%
Sector exposure
| quant Dynamic Asset Allocation | UTI Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| N.A. | 29.62% | 0.00% |
| Banks | 0.00% | 23.06% |
| Telecom - Services | 18.81% | 3.50% |
| Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology | 13.07% | 2.61% |
| CRISIL AAA | 0.00% | 11.12% |
| Power | 9.50% | 0.48% |
| Metals & Minerals Trading | 9.45% | 0.47% |
| Realty | 8.70% | 1.98% |
| SOV | 6.06% | 0.00% |
| IT - Software | 0.00% | 5.68% |
| CRISIL A1+ | 0.00% | 5.48% |
| Sovereign | 1.72% | 4.93% |
| Automobiles | 0.00% | 4.75% |
| Petroleum Products | 1.94% | 4.29% |
Questions people ask
What is the difference between quant Dynamic Asset Allocation and UTI Balanced Advantage returns?
As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return −0.24% vs +2.13%; 3-year CAGR +13.47% vs +10.14%; 5-year CAGR — vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.
How do quant Dynamic Asset Allocation and UTI Balanced Advantage compare on risk?
Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) 15.94% vs 9.21%; Sharpe ratio 0.44 vs 0.40; Sortino ratio 0.70 vs 0.55; maximum drawdown −18.43% vs −10.47%; beta 0.95 vs 0.59.
How much do quant Dynamic Asset Allocation and UTI Balanced Advantage overlap?
By weight, 7.3% of the two portfolios is invested in the same companies; 5 stocks are held by both, the largest shared positions being Bharti Airtel Limited, Reliance Industries Limited, Aurobindo Pharma Limited. Based on the portfolios disclosed for Sep 2026 and Sep 2026.
What is the large, mid and small cap split of quant Dynamic Asset Allocation and UTI Balanced Advantage?
quant Dynamic Asset Allocation: large cap 40.1%, mid cap 13.1%, small cap 6.3%. UTI Balanced Advantage: large cap 57.3%, mid cap 7.3%, small cap 3.1% (share of the fund's assets, from its latest disclosed portfolio).
Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?
No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.
More comparisons
quant Dynamic Asset Allocation vs
- quant Dynamic Asset Allocation vs ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage
- quant Dynamic Asset Allocation vs Mirae Asset Balanced Advantage
- quant Dynamic Asset Allocation vs SBI Balanced Advantage
- quant Dynamic Asset Allocation vs UTI - Unit Linked Insurance Plan
- quant Dynamic Asset Allocation vs Baroda BNP Paribas Balanced Advantage
- quant Dynamic Asset Allocation vs HSBC Balanced Advantage
UTI Balanced Advantage vs
- UTI Balanced Advantage vs Bajaj Finserv Balanced Advantage
- UTI Balanced Advantage vs Franklin India Balanced Advantage
- UTI Balanced Advantage vs JioBlackRock Balanced Advantage
- UTI Balanced Advantage vs NJ Balanced Advantage
- UTI Balanced Advantage vs Tata Balanced Advantage
- UTI Balanced Advantage vs Axis Balanced Advantage
All Balanced Advantage comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →
Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.