DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt Fund vs UTI Financial Services Debt Fund
DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt Fund and UTI Financial Services Debt Fund are both Banking & Financial Services Funds. As of 6 Nov 2026 (Direct plan, Growth option): 3-year CAGR — vs —, 5-year CAGR — vs —, volatility — vs —, maximum drawdown −0.15% vs —.
Showing the Direct plan, Growth option. Portfolio, sector and market-cap figures are the same for every plan and option of a fund.
Key facts
| DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt | UTI Financial Services Debt | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund house | DSP Mutual Fund | UTI Mutual Fund |
| Compared as | Banking & Financial Services Funds | Banking & Financial Services Funds |
| NAV | ₹10.0906 | — |
| NAV date | 6 Nov 2026 | — |
| Launched (first NAV) | 28 Aug 2026 | — |
| Track record | 0.2 yrs | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | ₹685 Cr | — |
| Securities held | 21 | — |
| Portfolio as of | 30 Sep 2026 | Not disclosed yet |
| Fund page | Full record → | Full record → |
Returns
| DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt | UTI Financial Services Debt | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +0.31% | — |
| 3 months | — | — |
| 6 months | — | — |
| 1 year | — | — |
| 3 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| 5 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| 7 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| 10 years (CAGR) | — | — |
| Since launch (CAGR) | — | — |
| SIP return (XIRR, 5 years) ⓘ | — | — |
Up to one year: absolute return. Beyond one year: CAGR. Computed from each fund's own NAV history (AMFI), measured to the latest NAV.
Risk
| DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt | UTI Financial Services Debt | |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (annualised) ⓘ | — | — |
| Downside volatility ⓘ | — | — |
| Sharpe ratio ⓘ | — | — |
| Sortino ratio ⓘ | — | — |
| Maximum drawdown ⓘ | −0.15% | — |
| Recovery from that fall | 0 months | — |
| Current fall from peak | 0.00% | — |
| Rolling 1-year return: worst | — | — |
| Rolling 1-year return: median | — | — |
| Rolling 1-year return: best | — | — |
| Share of 1-year periods with a loss | — | — |
Against each fund's benchmark
| DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt | UTI Financial Services Debt | |
|---|---|---|
| Beta ⓘ | — | — |
| Alpha (Jensen's, annualised) ⓘ | — | — |
| R² ⓘ | — | — |
| Upside capture | — | — |
| Downside capture | — | — |
| Tracking error | — | — |
| Information ratio | — | — |
| Treynor ratio | — | — |
Portfolio
UTI Financial Services Debt Fund has no usable portfolio disclosure on file yet, so portfolio comparisons are shown only where available.
Asset mix
| DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt | UTI Financial Services Debt | |
|---|---|---|
| Debt | 98.73% | — |
| Cash & equivalents | 1.27% | — |
Market-cap split (share of fund assets)
| DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt | UTI Financial Services Debt | |
|---|---|---|
| Large Cap | 0.00% | — |
| Mid Cap | 0.00% | — |
| Small Cap | 0.00% | — |
| Unclassified | 0.00% | — |
Concentration
| DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt | UTI Financial Services Debt | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 66.18% | — |
| Effective number of stocks ⓘ | 17.5 | — |
| Securities held | 21 | — |
Top 10 holdings
DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt
- 7.35% Bharti Telecom Limited (15/10/2027)8.53%
- Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.7.65%
- 8.05% State Government Securities7.50%
- 7.6% Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited (19/05/2028)7.44%
- 7.18% Sundaram Finance Limited (16/05/2028)7.40%
- 7.3763% Bajaj Finance Limited (26/06/2028)7.35%
- 7.65% HDB FIN SERV NCD 10-09-277.31%
- Piramal Finance Ltd.4.51%
- 7.90% Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (30/08/2027)4.41%
- Infina Finance Pvt Limited4.08%
UTI Financial Services Debt
Not disclosed yet.
Sector exposure
| DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt | UTI Financial Services Debt | |
|---|---|---|
| CRISIL AAA | 68.45% | — |
| Sovereign | 9.00% | — |
| CRISIL AA+ | 4.61% | — |
| CARE AA+ | 4.51% | — |
| CARE AAA | 4.41% | — |
| CRISIL A1+ | 4.08% | — |
| ICRA AA+ | 3.67% | — |
Questions people ask
What is the difference between DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt and UTI Financial Services Debt returns?
As of 6 Nov 2026, Direct plan Growth option: 1-year return — vs —; 3-year CAGR — vs —; 5-year CAGR — vs —; 10-year CAGR — vs —. Past returns do not indicate future returns.
How do DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt and UTI Financial Services Debt compare on risk?
Volatility (36 monthly returns, annualised) — vs —; Sharpe ratio — vs —; Sortino ratio — vs —; maximum drawdown −0.15% vs —; beta — vs —.
Is this a recommendation to choose one of these funds?
No. This page places the published figures of both funds side by side. It does not rank, rate or recommend either fund; which one suits an investor depends on their goals, horizon and risk tolerance.
More comparisons
DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt vs
- DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt vs Bank of India Banking & Financial Services
- DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt vs Edelweiss Financial Services
- DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt vs ITI Banking and Financial Services
- DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt vs quant BFSI
- DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt vs Aditya Birla Sun Life Banking and Financial Services
- DSP Financial Services Sectoral Debt vs BANK OF INDIA MANUFACTURING & INFRASTRUCTURE
UTI Financial Services Debt vs
- UTI Financial Services Debt vs HDFC Banking & Financial Services
- UTI Financial Services Debt vs LIC MF Banking and Financial Services
- UTI Financial Services Debt vs Sundaram Financial Services Opportunities
- UTI Financial Services Debt vs Bajaj Finserv Banking and Financial Services
- UTI Financial Services Debt vs Canara Robeco Banking and Financial Services
- UTI Financial Services Debt vs ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services
All Banking & Financial Services Funds comparisons → · Compare up to six funds yourself → · Every fund in this category → · All comparisons →
Sources: NAV from AMFI; returns, risk and ratios computed by MF Analyser from each fund's NAV history (risk on 36 monthly returns, risk-free rate 6.5%); benchmark ratios against each fund's benchmark total-return index; portfolios from each fund house's monthly disclosure. Returns and ratios as of 6 Nov 2026. IDCW options show no return or risk figures because payouts reduce the NAV and AMFI's file carries no payout history to add back. This page compares published figures only — it does not rank, rate or recommend either fund. Past performance does not indicate future returns; mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.