Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund
All plans and options of Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund
| Scheme (as filed with AMFI) | Plan | Option | NAV | AMFI code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund — Direct Plan — Growth | Direct | Growth | ₹127.8360 12 Nov 2026 | 140228 |
| Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund — Direct Plan — IDCW | Direct | IDCW | ₹93.2150 12 Nov 2026 | 140227 |
| Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund — Regular Plan — Growth | Regular | Growth | ₹107.7380 12 Nov 2026 | 140225 |
| Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund — Regular Plan — IDCW | Regular | IDCW | ₹62.1140 12 Nov 2026 | 140226 |
Direct–Growth is the plan and option we treat as this fund's main page, so search engines are pointed there. Everything below is this filing's own data.
Fund basics
Everything the NAV says
Computed from 2,456 published NAVs between 28 Nov 2016 and 12 Nov 2026 — 10.0 years of history. Nothing here is an estimate; it is arithmetic on what the fund actually printed.
How it has moved
Return over time (%)
| Fund name | 1M | 3M | 6M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 7Y | 10Y | Since launch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund Regular | 3.80 | -2.50 | 2.94 | 3.34 | 18.28 | 15.47 | 22.10 | — | 18.27 |
| NIFTY Midcap 150 TRI benchmark | -6.90 | -5.42 | 9.66 | 2.62 | 13.28 | 14.51 | 21.54 | 16.44 | 19.38 |
| Mid Cap category median · 33 funds | — | — | — | 4.22 | 15.58 | 12.66 | — | 15.96 | — |
Anything over a year is annualised (CAGR); shorter windows are absolute. The benchmark row is the index's own Total Return Index, as published by NSE, measured to 12 Nov 2026. The category row is the median Regular plan in Mid Cap — the middle fund, not a ranking, and a median rather than an average so that one mis-stated scheme cannot move it. As on 12 Nov 2026.
Risk measures
| Fund name | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Beta | Alpha | Max fall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund Regular | 18.04 | 0.65 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 2.53 | -41.14 |
| NIFTY Midcap 150 TRI benchmark | 18.40 | 0.37 | 0.56 | — | — | -43.06 |
Risk-free rate 6.5%. The benchmark row is the index's NSE Total Return Index. Beta and alpha need the index as a reference, so the benchmark's own row leaves them blank.
Against its benchmark
Regressed on the 36 months this fund and NIFTY Midcap 150 TRI both have, using NSE's own Total Return Index for it. Alpha is Jensen's — the return left over after the market move this fund's own beta would predict.
| Alpha | Beta | R² | Fund vs index | Up capture | Down capture | Tracking error | Information ratio | Treynor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.53% | 0.97 | 94% | 2.59% | 104% | 95% | 4.47% | 0.58 | 11.19 |
Up and down capture are the pair worth reading together: a fund that takes 95% of the rises but only 80% of the falls is doing something a headline CAGR will never show you.
Risk
| Volatility | Downside volatility | Sharpe | Sortino |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.0% | 12.1% | 0.65 | 0.98 |
Risk-free rate 6.5%, roughly the 10-year government bond.
The worst it has been
| Deepest fall | Time to recover | Today, from its peak |
|---|---|---|
| -41.1% | 8 months | -3.3% |
A drawdown is the fall from a previous high to the low that followed it. It is the number that decides whether somebody stays invested — a fund can have an excellent ten-year return and still have been unbearable to hold in year four.
Every one-year period it has lived through
| Best year | Median year | Worst year | Losing years |
|---|---|---|---|
| 111.4% | 12.5% | -29.0% | 17% |
Rolling returns ask a fairer question than a single five-year figure: not "what did it do from this one start date", but "what happened across every start date". A fund whose worst year is −45% is a different proposition from one whose worst is −8%, even if the averages match.
Calendar years
If you had run a SIP
₹10,000 every month for five years — ₹600,000 invested in all — would be worth ₹910,616 today, an XIRR of 16.71% a year.
XIRR, not CAGR. A SIP's money arrives over sixty months, so most of it has been invested for far less than five years — which is why this figure normally sits below the five-year CAGR above in a rising market, and above it in a falling one. It is the return the investor got, not the return the fund got.
What it actually holds
The real portfolio the AMC filed with AMFI, as on 31 Oct 2026. Nothing here is estimated — when a fund has no filing in our store the section simply does not appear. A fund is its holdings; the returns above are only what those holdings did.
Asset allocation
A fund's risk starts here — how much of it is even in the market — before any question of which stocks or which sectors. Cash is not idleness; it is the manager's choice not to be invested, and it shows up as a drag in a rising market and a cushion in a falling one.
Portfolio aggregates
Concentration
| Number of stocks | 104 |
|---|---|
| Top 5 stocks | 13.75% |
| Top 10 stocks | 23.66% |
| Top 20 stocks | 39.59% |
| Largest single holding | 3.45% |
| Largest sector | Banks · 11.72% |
| Number of sectors | 36 |
| Effective stocks | 74.2 |
| Cash & equivalents | 0.00% |
Counting positions overstates diversification. The effective-stocks figure is the honest count: a portfolio can hold seventy names and still have most of its money in twenty.
Sector allocation
Largest holdings
Top 10 are 24.1% of the fund. A high number means a concentrated portfolio — fewer names doing more of the work, for better and for worse.
Disclosed holdings from the AMC's AMFI filing, largest first. A portfolio is filed monthly and shifts between filings — this is the most recent one loaded, not a live book.
What the manager did last month
Between the filing of 30 Sep 2026 and 31 Oct 2026. A position grows for two reasons — the manager bought more, or the price went up — and only the first is a decision. The share count is what separates them, because it moves only when somebody trades.
Swipe the table sideways for share counts, price change and values.
| Stock | Shares traded | Change in shares | Change in price | Value of the trade₹ crore | Position now₹ crore |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New positiondid not hold this a month ago 3 | |||||
| Sagility Ltd. | 30,481,726 | entered | — | 128 | 128 |
| One 97 Communications Ltd. | 567,758 | entered | — | 92.8 | 92.8 |
| EDELWEISS MONEY MARKET FUND - DIRECT PL | 14,663,959 | entered | — | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Added tobought more shares than last month 8 | |||||
| Laurus Labs Ltd. | 787,441 | +120.2% | +21.5% | 189 | 347 |
| Multi Commodity Exchange Of India Ltd. | 400,204 | +25.5% | -3.4% | 128 | 629 |
| Billionbrains Garage Ventures Ltd. | 5,723,852 | +80.0% | +4.1% | 110 | 247 |
| The Indian Hotels Company Ltd. | 684,085 | +16.9% | +11.4% | 55.5 | 384 |
| FSN E-Commerce Ventures Ltd. | 1,548,816 | +26.2% | +9.2% | 54.1 | 261 |
| AU Small Finance Bank Ltd. | 557,448 | +19.2% | -14.5% | 48.2 | 299 |
| Ajanta Pharma Ltd. | 124,510 | +21.4% | -3.1% | 43.7 | 248 |
| NTPC Green Energy Ltd. | 4,470,961 | +66.7% | -11.7% | 36.9 | 92.2 |
| Trimmedcut the share count, without selling out 8 | |||||
| Ather Energy Ltd. | 763,884 | -53.4% | +23.2% | 134 | 117 |
| Cummins India Ltd. | 106,988 | -34.0% | -6.5% | 47.6 | 92.4 |
| Jubilant Foodworks Ltd. | 1,034,740 | -33.9% | -7.6% | 43.7 | 85.3 |
| Bharat Forge Ltd. | 222,613 | -13.7% | -10.7% | 38.3 | 242 |
| TVS Motor Company Ltd. | 83,927 | -13.0% | +2.2% | 35.2 | 236 |
| ICICI Prudential Asset Mgmt Co Ltd. | 121,444 | -30.2% | -13.7% | 32.9 | 75.9 |
| Coromandel International Ltd. | 184,035 | -30.2% | -3.5% | 31.2 | 72.3 |
| Craftsman Automation Ltd. | 14,940 | -13.6% | -1.4% | 15.3 | 97.3 |
| Sold out ofheld last month, gone this month 5 | |||||
| BSE Ltd. | 1,196,328 | exited | — | 370 | — |
| Polycab India Ltd. | 196,230 | exited | — | 157 | — |
| Hero MotoCorp Ltd. | 173,622 | exited | — | 91.0 | — |
| S.J.S. Enterprises Ltd. | 232,363 | exited | — | 52.5 | — |
| Deepak Nitrite Ltd. | 90 | exited | — | 0.0 | — |
Only stocks and fund units are listed. Treasury bills, repo and money-market lines roll over every month by design — they are larger in rupees than most equity trades and are not decisions, so they are summarised as cash above rather than listed as activity. Share counts and values are the fund house's own filing. What a position cost when it was first bought is in no monthly disclosure, so a value here is what the shares were worth at the later filing, not what was paid.
One caveat on the share count: a corporate action — a stock split, a bonus issue, a merger, or an ISIN change — also moves the number of shares without the manager trading, and a monthly disclosure does not flag it. A sudden clean multiple (a doubling, a halving) is more likely a split than a decision. Treat a single large, round jump as something to check against the stock's own corporate-action history rather than as the manager buying or selling.
How it compares in its category
Against the Mid Cap Regular schemes with the highest three-year return. Same category, same plan — the only comparison that means anything. The list re-sorts itself as returns move; it is an ordering by one number, not a view on which fund anyone should hold.
| Scheme | Return | Alpha | Beta | Volatility | Sharpe | Max fall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund Edelweiss Mutual Fund · this scheme | 18.3% | 2.5% | 0.97 | 18.0% | 0.65 | -41.1% |
| Invesco India Mid Cap Fund Invesco Mutual Fund | 22.7% | 4.9% | 1.03 | 20.4% | 0.80 | -70.8% |
| HSBC Midcap Fund HSBC Mutual Fund | 21.2% | 4.7% | 1.05 | 20.4% | 0.72 | -26.1% |
| WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund | 19.6% | 3.9% | 0.92 | 17.0% | 0.77 | -19.7% |
| ICICI Prudential Mid Cap Fund ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund | 19.6% | 3.3% | 1.02 | 18.7% | 0.70 | -75.1% |
| BANDHAN MID CAP FUND Bandhan Mutual Fund | 16.6% | 1.1% | 0.97 | 18.3% | 0.55 | -23.3% |
| ITI Mid Cap Fund ITI Mutual Fund | 16.7% | 0.7% | 1.04 | 19.2% | 0.53 | -23.8% |
| Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund Nippon India Mutual Fund | 16.4% | 0.8% | 0.97 | 17.9% | 0.55 | -62.7% |
| Sundaram Mid Cap Fund Sundaram Mutual Fund | 16.5% | 0.8% | 0.96 | 17.7% | 0.56 | -68.7% |
Alpha and beta are against NIFTY Midcap 150 TRI. Max fall is the deepest peak-to-trough drop in each fund's own history, so a longer-running fund has had more chances to record a bad one. Click a column to sort. This is a sort, not a ranking, and nothing here is a recommendation.
Compare Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund side by side
Returns, risk ratios, portfolio overlap, sectors and market-cap split against each of the other 33 Mid Cap funds.
- vs Aditya Birla Sun Life Midcap
- vs Axis Midcap
- vs Bandhan Mid Cap
- vs Bank Of India Mid Cap
- vs Baroda Bnp Paribas Mid Cap
- vs Canara Robeco Mid Cap
- vs Dsp Midcap
- vs Franklin India Mid Cap
- vs Hdfc Mid Cap
- vs Helios Mid Cap
- vs Hsbc Midcap
- vs Icici Prudential Mid Cap
- vs Invesco India Mid Cap
- vs Iti Mid Cap
- vs Jm Mid Cap
- vs Kotak Mid Cap
- vs Lic Mf Mid Cap
- vs Mahindra Manulife Mid Cap
- vs Mirae Asset Midcap
- vs Motilal Oswal Midcap
- vs Nippon India Growth Mid Cap
- vs Pgim India Midcap
- vs Quant Mid Cap
- vs Samco Mid Cap
- vs Sbi Midcap
- vs Sundaram Mid Cap
- vs Tata Mid Cap
- vs Taurus Mid Cap
- vs The Wealth Company Mid Cap
- vs Trustmf Mid Cap
- vs Union Midcap
- vs Uti Mid Cap
- vs Whiteoak Capital Mid Cap
What a Mid Cap scheme is
At least 65% in companies ranked 101st to 250th by market value.
The middle of the market: businesses large enough to have survived a cycle, small enough to double. Returns are higher over long periods and the falls are deeper — a 40% drawdown is ordinary here, not a crisis.
Who it suits. Investors who already hold large-cap funds and can leave the money untouched through a bad year.
How long money should stay. 7 years or more.
Questions people ask
What is the NAV of Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund — Regular Plan — Growth?
₹107.7380 as on 12 Nov 2026, from AMFI's daily NAV file. NAV is declared once each business day after markets close, so the figure here is the most recent one published.
What is the difference between the Direct and Regular plan of Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund?
They hold the identical portfolio, run by the same manager. A Regular plan pays a distributor commission out of the fund, inside its expense ratio — commonly 0.5% to 1.2% a year more than Direct. That difference is charged on the whole balance every year, so it compounds. As an illustration, not a forecast: ₹1,00,000 invested for ten years at 12% a year ends at about ₹3.11 lakh, but at 10.5% — a 1.5 percentage-point gap and nothing else changed — it ends at about ₹2.71 lakh, roughly ₹40,000 less. The longer you hold, the wider the gap. Direct is the same fund without the commission.
What does the Growth option mean?
Growth reinvests everything the fund earns back into the NAV. Nothing is paid out, so the NAV rises with returns and you are taxed only when you sell. For anybody who does not need income from the investment, Growth is the simpler and usually the more tax-efficient option.
What kind of scheme is this?
At least 65% in companies ranked 101st to 250th by market value. The middle of the market: businesses large enough to have survived a cycle, small enough to double. Returns are higher over long periods and the falls are deeper — a 40% drawdown is ordinary here, not a crisis.
How long should money stay in it?
Typically 7 years or more. Investors who already hold large-cap funds and can leave the money untouched through a bad year.
